[S3.25.6.2010]
[world edition]
[stack counts 3308]

As we all know the “bunk,” (in the UK bunk means when someone or some group of people try to use “smoke and mirrors” to cover up or use language which is clearly fake, is spun up to berate some fact or event), of Ian Bunking Smith the snivelling sidekick of the butterball turkey of which Camp of Cameron (leader of the UK government and CONserVATives), is out to spin the voter with the idea that making it impossible to get your old age pension unless you do the right thing or in the case of Bunking Smith, (i.e. Mr B.S.), you have a state pension since he is growing fat off the fact he is an MP or those boobs out there in the public sector who often get one for free, but those that haven’t got the golden slippers, for when they reach 64 (and not a Beatles song in sight), will find as suspected that the flim-flam of law has been rigged with the usual “smoke and mirrors,” of getting the public into the realms of George W Bush land or in 2010 the United Kingdom of Canada or some other bone head of thick cranial plates from the last stone-age mentality.  OK we usually de-bunk, the bunkers who try to swing the cat of how to occlude, or use occlusive ways and means to bury bad news in bad news and tell the masses that si what must be done since even now the bungling half-wit Bunking Smith, cant quite get to grips with what happens to the old or the potential  old that today have woken up to the landslide news that if you now 20 and say the age limits for a pension goes up only 1 year in five, you’ll have to be almost 80 or in the end when the bunking laws don’t work or the world finds that money is really tighter since the lifestyles living on oil and want and waste still doesn’t work you may end having to be, 120 to get a state pension,  but we see the lifestyles of the rich and deep pockets of those in Whitehall and their dishonest, honourable members of some bone-head constituency will grow nice a fat on the land.

The real issue here it doesn’t matter what you political belief is here, you have to take a view that this is not laws that help this is ideology occluding itself by and behind a smoke and mirrors, game with the old cloak and dagger approach to making you, socially responsible, ok there are some that will whine on about things, but what if you are old, or near retirement, what if you in your 20s and you have a young family or are thinking about what will happen about old age? It wont matter what you voted for the scars of the Housing Act the Dumbseekers Allowance and the rest of the clown laws made in this stone-age land all add up to one thing, they are proclaimed and proclamated, with no thought as to what feedback will cause and if you fail as clearly Mr Bunking Smith has done to allocate feedback since what the heckers, those that make such “bunk,” are not actually affected by it and those that are well lets de-bunk the “bunkers.”

What is this really about money and the “money-trap,” or the old toads in power spinning the news with one spin or two spins? What benefit is going to make up the shortfall if the elderly person, is too sick to work or has limited movement, or cant hear or see, or is an zimmer frame are they going to get a pension? Or is there some other game at play?

[S3.25.6.2010]
[world edition]
[stack counts 2795]

Well today is a lovely day for fantasies, one of course that the world would bend over backwards and fall back onto the spikes of imperious, or just for the Camp Cameron to plug, the idea of world dominationatrix by the means of sadistic UK CONserVATives (Tory or Tories), who in the last 24 hours seem to want to make more people homeless, and poor by telling them to leave secure homes owned by the state go to a new site, in an unsecured way, and look for work so that the pro-right wing party can save money, the views, which explains the idea of getting the Canadian leader into the political bed with the notion of a business model to follow. As it is the world did not turn into the pudding club, that those on the delusional Tory front bench, could use as a foot rest for their brand of hypocritical garbage and rattle the sabre at.  Obama really did sit as far away from the Brit oily hands and sweaty mits, Brits  that seem to feel that a brand of crackpot ideology will somehow make the world more competitive and more economically stable, with cuts, and with, a right wing, idealism.  Well bar none.

Still is the world now going to be set up under the grip of 8 world leaders having a little “tet-a-tet,” well I remember that old Abba song, ‘money, money, money,’ well if you are the worlds fattest and certainly the greedist, and have a nice lavish lifestyles based on consumption of well any natural resource then I guess those in the rest of the world have to be told what to think,’ its a rich man’s world,’ if you factor in the huge drink up of oil and every natural resource.

Still Obama put on the gloves and has given a few well chosen blows at those in the world that feel that the public have to be herded around, but seems to have given the extremist right wing leader of the UK CONserVATives a taxi ride in Marine 1 and a bazaar staged TV plug swigging beer, however Obama’s language looked troubled, since we doubt he actually did mean a word of it, since the words really didn’t ‘join up all the dots,’ and seemed more cautious than a big bed buddy to the UK government leader,  and the get out clause by the windbag leader of the UK Government finally realising that the crass war in Afghanistan is only going to fail will leave the US wondering is this the close bed-time relationship they want to have?  Obama has not posted much on the way of news and lacks any real aim over climate, but, he had some notions on the waste of natural resources, since that is what fuels the greed of the west and is the real name of economy, and growth, the pseudo economical language of the UK is recovery, and consumption, the real waste is that camp Cameron still thinks that the public are ready to lap up the fantasy that he is still trying to sell.

But wait, don’t think its quite that simple, why?  Well remember that episode to arrive in October, how more cuts and wrangles are to be set on the tax payer, watch very very carefully for those things being hid up the sleeves of the right wing fruit cakes called CONserVATives.

Today camp Cameron is now seen nibbling the rabbit, like ears of Anglea, Merkels, so, another ploy to sell to the G 20 more of the junk that waste and want, the continuation of burning oil, is the way the world must live by!!

[S3.27.6.2010]
[special edition]
[stack counts 3334]

Today the UK CONserVATives, have announced a new “CON-game,” in that the umeployable must now be encouraged to mover around the UK on an aimless, pointless idea that they will move from dole claim to dole claim not withstanding the 3 waiting days they don’t get paid, and the idea that this new attack is in fact aimed at ‘council housing and social housing,’ but not those that make money out of the “poverty industry,” or those that buy more and more old housing to make more money out of the housing benefit system i.e. private landlords, and the usual Tories own local councils that get up to 12 times the same amount of council tax for a house or a set of houses divided up into private rented accommodation, to soak up more central government money in the form of council tax benefit, this new game from the Ian Bunking Smith brigade is clearly a CON in that the public are clearly not going to go for that, or that as such a new law would have to be brought in to compel people to do that, since no one unless the situation is very dicey would make themselves intentionally homeless, and if under this new scheme that they in fact do, travel about the UK it will make no difference since those employers have no real need to employ those dumped into this latest warped crackpot ploy from the right wing oh sorry the Canadian right wing care of 10 Downing Street London centre of social injustice.

So here we go again the 1983 Margaret Hilda-Ogden Thatcher, ploy to make the miracle of right wing ideology work by getting rid of the victims of the capitalism ploys and the crass ideas that the very poor and the very weak must pay with their lives for which the means and method to simply up sticks and move is frankly a joke.  Similarly we know from the past that when ever the gamble and chance routine is played by the right wing it is done on the basis that those that don’t go for it will end up a victim anyway, since since we know that the surfeit of more crass laws and cuts is only around the corner in October so whether this new moronic ploy to make the figures seem much smaller than they are now, or the savings by having those claimants nudged out fo the way, by losing money, therefore saving money, and claims having to be closed down and the a new claim made at the new destination will save money since the 3 days wait, or the 2 week wait for any new money to be paid would make a fake statistic but the claimants real status would be the same, unless the rank and file of the right wing is actually telling us that those that travel would have a home waiting for them to just move into and have benefit on tap?

This is clearly a game of which those that have little options and cannot in any sense absorb the loss of the money cannot really be expected to simply move this is the most dumbest ploy we have ever heard of, but dumb doesn’t always, mean without an aim, since those that cant or don’t how are they to be treated? And those that do and find that they still cant get a job what are they to do then move on and and move to another area? And is the world now ready to have “cattle-market-express” trains full of claimants rattling around the UK?  Anyone that supports this idea of move, shift and push-on and find a job is really living in 1983.

[S3.25.6.2010]
[dark blog series]
[world edition]
[stack counts 1729]

Tyrannical tin-pot leader Bob Mugarbe, has really become a total mu-garbage, with the diamond grab, bodies beaten or just shot in the head for diamonds since those in the west with the “consumer-led-economy,” and never ending glut for useless junk such as a diamond, a form of carbon, have as normal little or no sense of where or what those little bits of ice, glinting and hard are built on harsh, greed that hits with a harsh, beat on the skulls of those that don’t produce very similar to Coltan, the metal known as Tantalum the ore diggers get pence for the bags they produce dressed in rags where the capacitor, metal ends up in iPads, mobile phones and the rest of electronic junk, that once done with end up going the last mile with the bin-man. But again has the west gotten so devoid of care for what, or anything happens that with this blood soaked industry, for diamonds, is kicked into the long grass with glee, since as long as those consumers are well consuming  burning up anything and everything made out of oil, gas, blood sweat and tears, then again there is the air industry, the magazine industry and well an industry for well anything to do with the west.

One of the crocodiles in this torture and skin for hire at the end of a gun barrel Canadile, mines said that those blood soaked diamonds are on sale for the international market, lets see now, well who would be able to buy such hell? I guess the very wealthy do, wearing these stone-age, trinkets like some sort of British colonial, hunting trophy, but the only stuffed animals heads are likely to be those digging in the dirt for a few pence or shot dead if they don’t.

Xoxo

The Dark bloggers

[S3.25.6.2010]
[world edition]
[dark blog series]
[stack counts]

Today the horrid subject of abortion has popped up again but the latest story is that since a baby is at 24 weeks unable to feel pain then its ok to do the termination again a chance has been reached and missed to make the dead drop limit to 16 weeks which most of the medical world I guess would be happy with, still science has somehow souped up the idea, that since they are not the baby and test shows that critical ganglia and other axon and other nervous tissues are not wired up, this then precludes any possible way that pain can be registered in the brain section or lobe that deals processes and sends to mind and memory.

The issues is the womb state the baby and its bio-chemical computer, builds and re-channels many lines of communication over the manufacturing process right up to and after the roll out from the hang. So this is really playing blinds man’s bluff, since we all know that science doesn’t have sufficient knowledge on what all those circuits do, and what they are wired up to, if the baby can move its limbs, open an eyelid, move a limb even in a primitive sense then those servo systems are wired up and work since there would have to be a relay, from the point of execution to the limb muscles being fired in the correct order to effect the movement, if the eye is formed and it is capable of receiving photons being transferred into electrical impulses which in most mammalian forms is a complex and highly sophisticated build, then there would have to be a set of pathways.

Oddly the stone-age kingdom of Eire has decided to stick to religion and the usual Bible bashing rule that according to the invention of god from the old Greek translations to the Hebrew over a hot cup of tea made from a tea bag, so a brew and a brew, that the god has told them that they cant have this medical procedure anyway so no change from the 16th century country then.

So to have abortion or not? To be or not to be? What is the answer?

The literal antonym of this is a sign that the world is so lazy to take care or so stupid to miss the periods or has the world become so addictive to the idea that well, if I get preggers I can then dump what I haven’t bothered to take care of?

So who should pay for the D&C? Who should pay up for something that is not an ailment, other than for medical reasons or illness or disability or death?

Then again with the idea of the beautiful people web site what would the world do if only the most anatomically correct babies are required? And what drives this, magazines those with extra white teeth ruby red lips and great hair do? And what about those babies that didn’t make it to grade A chicken womb fresh?

Has flesh and blood now become another commodity and where does this say the world is going.

xoxo

The Dark Bloggers

[S3.25.6.2010]
[world edition]
[stack counts 1988]

Obama, has his green aims gone mouldy? Or is this pet-talk with camp, Cameron the UK government leader reached the bottom of the oil barrel?  This issue is the one that in the eyes of economy, or recovery, or global economies, and consumers and consumer led economies, have little time for, the issues are clear, what happens when the oil runs out, and how long does the greedy west whose entire life runs on, burns and in the end will go to war to get? What happened to all that COP 15 guff, about dealing with this, where are the green world jobs gone or have they just gone green with mould or is green more to do with garden centre green fly, than, green house effects and carboniferous effects making the consumption of ‘black-gold,’ seem like a big oily glob of death, rather than looking at a world beyond oil?

What happened to all those crank ideas, all that solar farm rubbish all that cars that run of fuel cells, and looking at how energy could be made more economic, in the drive to be the worlds leading economy, we see that at the G8 of the globs of oil burnt for this conference instead of virtual meeting, on line, or other wise how much oil is being burnt? How many meals and fat hotels are in use, how many cars and consumption of energy is going into this fat pad event?

Oil will have an endgame its happened before and it will happen again, the case is what are those in the spoiled brat governments of the world going to do about it?  Its seems that when energy, and how to use it correctly or how to utilise energy from other sources seems to be an anecdote, for those that talk green but then get into their car turn on the radio, and then go out and buy more consumer led products, and produce often shipped around the world for processing or for production as like the usual ‘Made in China,’ common joke.

Oil is the only way of life in the eyes of those that talk about economies, or consumption, or consumers.

Debunking

the

Myths
In this section we ask what is it that is always the same? Why do things have to be so lame, so dull, to thick in nature who says we cant change things, who says we have to live on a planet obsessed by the greed and the money, and the endless use of oil which in the end will reach an endgame, when this occurs people will ask, why did we let things get like this what is the truth about going green and what is the truth about the climate and the place we live, in the end, the myths will be finally debunked.

The myth that going green is about making money as that is the only way to do it.
The myth that, change will result in the end of economies.
The myth that going green will cause, financial hardship and limit developing counties and advancement.
The myth that there is no way to make, or do things other than oil.

Did going green really go mouldy?

This question asks the point after the Kyoto and the relevant event of my virtual visit to COP 15 and the news that followed, after COP 15 did the world change or is there another reason why, the issue of waste and want continues beyond the point that is clear that as the western world continues to burn more and more fuel, oil coal and gas due to planetary location, weather, seasons, or the very phantom way of living since the world is about what is continually seen as a way of life yes for the west, but not for most of the world or the development or cultures that seem to want to adopt the western lifestyles as they do, so does the use of natural resources since the occupation of want and waste is the link of use and exhausting of the finite elements, minerals oil, and coal that is the real driving force or most and all of the western and most of the developed world, since the actual reason for the use of words such as ‘economy, and recovery, and goods and services and the use of imports exports, trade and international businesses and the terms and factors that are connected to this regime in total disregard to the actual cost to the world of such a “way of life,” is not really nor does this actually really show that this is being achieved or even acted on, since the world and the process of money is directly related to the use of energy or resources.

Therefore the lack of any real interest or any real change is really due to the way the world works. Those in the energy trap, or the money trap, have little if any aspects to deal with matters that those that could in the case of many governments seem to take the green agenda as a means to make more money, or to profit but lack the skills and the moral or vital ingredient to act on what is clearly a statement of betrayal since the continual use of waste to fund life will only lead to the loss of any progress in the world since when something could have been done its been left to floppy and weak actions that clearly only propel the same old failed plans.

In the UK [ added and the western way of life], the arrogance of the culture of waste and want is clearly shown here, the detail here was inspired and is from which the ideas and plans that I have been given over time, where things could be better and where simply low cost and in many cases no cost whatsoever could have and should have been done to the “lifestyles,” which encompasses the detail of addictions to products and the endless fever of wanting more and more and the regardless cost to the planet here is clearly demonstrated.*

The basic conclusion, was that in the UK as in a lot of western cultures the ideal of want and waste, the need to have those born to serve the ideology that birth equates with a life time of work and living in a way that the previous generations did, that life is about being born with a life time debt to earn and spend and carry an tomb stone on the back and then pay and live in a stone age and frankly, old world way, is a significant lack of real aim to modernise to lead to find a way that can be used to save or to conserve or find an new way of living or planning or acting on or devising what really life is really supposed to be all about, the lack of foresight, the lack of really any interest and the disregard for the climate and planet damage is very much a part of this theme.

The state of things is in a vice grip, that only acts to continue since the means to continue is being borrowed from those resources that are available but for only a limited time, but it should be taken that this is what people are expected to do, or are completely unable to change since those methods of life and the culture of government, and the lack of inter-government collaboration to deal with issues that shared could be changed the culture of rigidly holding on to what is seen to work and what keeps control and the culture of lack of any want to change or lax or flabby lifestyles, that only remain since the way and the waste they are reliant on, maintains that status.
The implements of waste and want are:

Commodities markets.
Economy.
Need.
Desire.
Marketing.
Trade.
Lifestyles.
Essential use.
Money.
Those that can and cant afford premium products.
Advertising.
Cheap use of materials for cheap and cheerful products.
Seasonal, such as Xmas.
Using open cast mining.
China clay for magazines.
Packaging.
Global markets as claimed to be the need for imports and exports.
Exploitation.
Innovation.
Experimentation.
Medical.
Scientists.
Car dependency.
Trains, boats and a lot of aircraft.
War peace defence.
Psycho-mimetics.
Mental and society based conditioning.
Gender roles.
State and international collaborations.
Common across world agreements.
Understanding the link with population, and the growth of population around the world.
The question: what happens when the oil runs out?
People that can or those that are in the money trap.

It was clear from the outset, that waste was not going to be dealt with if, of course the western world lived on waste, lived on the use of materials and had to waste to make the fake economies keep rolling on, since there was no real means or method ever attempted to find and route out of addictions, the lack of knowledge, or the failure to plan for how to use stepping, sequences, to standardisation to use sense over stupidity,  weakness, psycho-mimetics, psychology, mental and sociological brain training, gender routes, the means to that designates what a person is from birth and what they should wear or do, in many factors here shown is all the real time, playback and telemetry, technology from us and the methods that such methods can be used very effectively, and also shows that the UK really hasn’t got any real plans to do anything with that modern or modern words “the green buzz word,” which has become a Mecca for making money of going green with no real lasting effects and no real changes other than telling people to turn the TV off at night before they put the cat out or tuning down the heating while the building people often live in is incapable of retaining or using energy in a well managed manner, and what is often the factor, that shows what can go wrong in an eco-system and the damming risks that failing to secure a proper, detailed aspect of which how the humans could make sensible and well needed changes can and no doubt will resultantly cause catastrophic harm and injury to the planet and ultimately damage the very life, that such greed and arrogance feeds on.*

When people talk about going green what does it really mean?
When words are sent about how to reduce the carbon footprints, what real effect does it have?
When its freezing cold in winter how can people not turn up the heating?
What energy does a family home really use?
What is the point in saying “green,” when its only implied in an industrial application that is to make money out of those that may in fact have none?

QUESTIONS, what happens after?
      Questions, wasted

  Answers, what do you know?  Ask?   What?

     Answers have you ever asked?

A long time ago (December 2009) in a galaxy not so far away, so no need to get your motorbike running and get onto the highway, or check with the masked magician how did I do that, I was asked to do a virtual tour of COP15 and a virtual tour of which via Linden Lab ‘Second Life,’ blogs and other things to see and to test what exactly did people have in regard to perceptions of ‘going green,’ (as in 2010 the UK and the public have no concept or any care or any interest on what they do or how much or for what they do, as long as the next load of useless rubbish commonly Made in China is “cheap and cheerful” (from 1995) the blog “has going green gone mouldy?”  (December 2009), was one of them as was the blogs onto directly the COP15 website which was a “hopper controlled,” and one of our first really well sought after aspects of blogging for environmental issues, (via on line ISP), a large matrix styled plot so to provoke ideas and thinking about the idea of environment impacts from anthropomorphic exploits using up natural or prehistorically formed assets such as alluvial salts, oil, Karigen, tar sands, oil shale’s, gas, using Autoclaves, Gasoline / Gasoil, bio- mass conversions and so on.*

To test and monitor and to blog with subtle but very effectively act to generate the ideas on what do you do?

      What does the world live on?

     What does this land or any land like England really need what do they have to rely on, or are expected to live on or by what means do they live?

The rogues gallery, of:

Waste.
Want.
Nuclear.
Gas.
Coal.
Oil shale
Tar sands
Bitumen
Wood.
Crude oil burners.
Straw burning.
Heat and power from waste or the ritual dumping of millions of tonnes of waste.
Production of electrical or electromotive force from a secondary means not associated with magnetics (gas).
Gas powered power stations.

And the green contestants row:

Water power.
Solar.
Solar Farms.
Poly-Voltaic-Windows.
Alternate fuels.
Hydrothermal.
Hydroelectric.
Bio-ethanol.
Bio-mass conversion.
Fuel cells.
Hybrid engines.
Gas powered engines.
Vegetable oil derived fuel engines.
Algae as a fuel.
Wind.
Theoretical contestants row:

Experiment IV.
Using plasma as a power source.
Particle manipulation and electrolytic conversion.
Energy management by the use of self managing buildings.
Part-time solar power for buildings.
Group shared housing power generation application.
Experiment 8.
Wave power.
Water mills (in series or by clusters).
Particle manipulation and synthesis using plasma or a electrolyte.
Multi-Generation Housing Systematisation.
Multi-Compartmentalised-Ablative-Cladding
Group-Energy-Dynamics.
Iso-Thermal (in households) Segmented Management.
Distribution of energy management.

The questions as asked in part 3 is all of that really what its made up to be?  The basic or basal argument is what is the real aim here and what is the real capability, that can be acted on, and if the acted points exhaust the actions when vital natural resources starts to be thin on the ground what was the case for any of the above and what was really known and what now and then did occur and what has in the present is being done?

After COP 15 what really changed? What real plans or really any effort to explore, test check ask, find, locate know tell, show, share, who, when what do they do, who did what, what was the real reason for?

The test is who has really explored who has really ever asked the questions and what did they do, about the natural and  synthetic?  When the oil runs out so does the world that used them lets not waste time on waste lets find explore find and make the world go on.

2010 the run up to the national and questionable legality and the money orientation that helped to drive certain, names and certain politicians to get voted in, the weak and frankly pathetic, general elections in the UK the Tories in fact had claimed that there was no climate change the language of saying that cutting green house gasses and the amending or planning to deal with mass waste and the often useless junk sold is so at the start or those tat shops, or greedy multinational companies and factories and so on push the life of want and waste clearly and definitely shows that where cleaning up and dealing with the issues, that no real intent has then been planned or considered

(Clearly those in power have no intent to “standardise products and resources use to conserve materials” and deal with the burn and bury ploys used in the UK)

[Konstance on Konstance]

Konstance from 1988-1996, (18-26), was involved in looking at what big oil giants such as Shell were up to and so on the briefing papers from Shell, the already concerns about population growth, oil use bio-mass conversions when oil runs out and so on, the issues of farming and practical food productions, and methods of producing food world trades and trends in lifestyles. Its a pitty that after all those years back the British or as the US likes to call them ‘Brits,’ still have not really taken on board really anything and really have no real idea anyway on what they intend to do anyway with the environment issues as they clearly do not really figure in the ideologically driven society.*

So the issues of climate, oil use, upstream views and the issues of population, and so on are old problems that have been a factor for over 25 years.*

Most of the actions carried out by the Brits, and the 31 years of noted exploits are those exploits not approved of by Konstance and her team, nor are those noted exploits carried out and executed by those from the UK Labour Political party or the UK ConserVATives ever only than to function in the realms of control, and that the phony ideal of economy or rather the continually ever in recovery economy, which in 2010 was recalculated to be nothing more than a “house of sand.” That means if you build a sand castle on a beach a wave of some type is only likely to wash the whole lot away time after time.  (The original blog is was tabled as a house of mud,but the same outcome would be same resultant of stupidity and intended consequence of what ever sugar-coated wrapper the credo of ideologically driven politics was in or what ever it said on the side of the Corn Flake packet).*

So going green is not about making people eat sunflower seeds, or the “money trap,” that means in the basic that people are expected to have money then money is then traded in the common defective capitalism or what Konstance now calls the “Capitalclysm” of which is a cross of Capitalism and Cataclysm, in that the grab for or the “dash for cash,” is used to prop up the useless way of life but it is this factor that is held to by most of not all the worlds states since the driving force in all countries is money, and therefore  the,  “acquisitions of  gain or psychology of gain,” its talking to with the people not at the people its more useful to educate, and make corrections were corrections can be made and smooth out the errors, and deal with the issue of want and waste, its pointless to see green issues as a new capitalism since that wont change things that are needed and only make things elongated and drawn out to a level that little or few changes would occur, so going green was a test to see, with real words with real actions that:*

Directional planning

       Stepping    testing     research   planning,    modernisations

finding out the facts not the fiction

knowing how to tackle the issues
1.standardises items that are repetitive in use.
2.deals with the useless waste and lack of conservation of which vital resources could be used better or not at all or monitoring how such uses are performed.
3.Communicated the legacy use and such events of using particular resources occurs and how this happens in the wild and throughout and after a product is used and reached the end of its serviceable life.
4.Dealing with the legacy of household waste, and the processes needed to deal with the aftermath of using natural resources.

In some cases the use of a car, or a bus, or a plane trip is not really the best way, its possible in many ways to use:

1.Video conferencing.
2.Virtual landscapes.
3.Computer designs.
4.Sending by e-mail the message rather than by post.
5.A full and un-tempered view and plan on what transport is needed, what items should be on sale and what amount of waste and use of natural resources should be used.
6.De-cloud the idea of green as a means to limit life.
7.Clear up the real issues from the old errors, such as housing, waste, industrial use and manufacture, commercial vehicular use, heavy plant use and agricultural vehicular use, military and other use.
8.Make it clear once and for all, what energy is being use, what energy is needed and how much energy should be used per application per, item per, factor.
9.Make clear what is acceptable, what is excessive and what can be done to curb the want and waste lifestyles of the west that has become reliant on the idea that the punter has to keep on buying and consumption to keep the fake economies of the west rolling while the real facts on what is being consumed and how much is really left to cope with demand is actually shown.
10.That the idea of Made in cheap China, and slavish lives and the idiotic idea that trade and life is about balance of trade for goods and services is really propping up an unsustainable way of life.
11.Showing people the facts, indications of what must change and why it must.
12.Take into view what the public really would have to and how it would affect the public in any regard to the issues of limits or controls on what is acceptable as manufactured goods and the use of oil, coal, salt, open cast mines, china clay, soil farming, gas fields, tapping for new fields, water loss, green house effect, green house gasses (water vapour, infra-red radians, carbon, nitrogenic and other oxidation of the atmosphere and the depletion of the gasses mass that is the breathable air.
13.Not and show on a new world wide study group and planning groups from all countries what the forward movement should be from the old economies that clearly don’t work and only work if you have money and can buy and sell goods and services.
14.Seek to set up a real monitoring and scaled up understanding why the environment is changing and the planets real decay and how the event of amplification by the actions of anthropomorphic events that are clearly there in the background and clearly out to damage.
15.To educate that the lifestyles of the west have a cost and if those that want that way of life then to make it more simplicated (made simple by syndications, ie applying action after study or research directly and applied the modifications that are carried onward in each new version), on what is used to support that life, and if its not supportable then it should be made or alternative ways of doing things simpler or easy to monitor or control the waste and the biological impact on the planet.
16.What was known and when what are the real reasons from which the plan not to change the wasteful ways of the western life are really based on.
17.Making the connections.
18.Having a real acid test to see what waste has to be dumped and what really can be recycled, and what is the impact of burning and burying.
19.A real world wide group on what happens when the oil runs out.
20.What are the real alternates and how practical are they?
21.Walking.
22.Using a bicycle.
23.Using the bus.
24.Not make trips that are not really of any need.

Learn from the errors of the past don’t make the mistake of confirming the old errors are the same errors now.

So you building the next hospital, a part of the new space shuttle, a name plate for your desk, or using technology, to find solutions is that car ride really in fact the way you need to do things? Wither you wanting a home, or a place to visit, a way to travel and a meal to eat.

Do you really need to buy that?

Do you really know what all that packaging is for?
      Is that really a good way to do something?

Do you really know what happens after the bin is empted?

        Do you really know what the impact of what you do is?

  Is that Car journey really needed or could you communicate by another way?
Do people really understand or care or cant care about what how, or why they live the way they do?

That new space shuttle part could be sent electronically.
Schools around the world can collaborate virtually.
Making, designing, and choosing the designs  and sending you name plate doesn’t need a car journey.
Design and innovation
Seeing things in an new light, is a new way to do things

(The fake economy and the fake recovery)

Another view on the “fake economy,”

Here is another strange aspect of the lack of admittance when something else doesn’t work, if something is now redundant, and its a means to keep on making the same mistake since its suits a small but greedy way of doing things, it only creates a “counter point, stand off status,” a stale mate, change doesn’t happen and if it does it then becomes a state that it had to or else, but if you did what you had to do the first time around, make something correct first time and instead of the wait for something then has to be done, counts as dealing with waste,  its the means in which things don’t work here in the UK the economy is used as a brand, and as a means to dictate under the two rights method and system of government in that the public have the right to vote, and the right to then be dictated to, they have no rights to ask, stop or enquire about anything which is supposed to be done on their behalf and have no choice of which and what law or any right to pursue the damage that is done to them even if that damage was intentional by those that in fact debated laws that in practice were done for the issues of making money, the use of the work ‘economy,’ and ‘recovery,’ are clearly misnomers in there own rights, since the actual economy is about two factors:*

1.The taxes paid to state.
2.The taxes used to pay for the society that has been put into a state that the public are so dependant on it, that they expect it to be there.
3.The economy is also really driven by the use of natural resources, and the buying and selling of manufactured goods, imports and exports, balance of payments, trade and trade deficit ultimately only in fact related to the sale and use of products that are only for one time or limited time use.

What happens in practice particular to the UK is the money, is really what it is about, the idea and fake ideal that people live in a world driven by trade, money and use of resources which is then termed:*

4.’The consumer.’
5.’Goods and services.
6.Consumption.’
7.Waste.
8.Legacy of incorrect and useless laws and ideological driven politicians.

Consumer are you one?
     And why do you consume?

    What other Ways are there to do the same thing?

The real mistake for the public is seeing that this system is only there as long as money and consumption occurs when it doesn’t, and the whole house of cards or “house of sand,” collapses then the economy then fails this oddly seems to be the one talking point that the blundering UK politicians cant find their tongues to mention, so, in fact, what we see here and the mindless waste is that the whole thing about GDP is a lie, and a deliberately un-uttered lie for which the cost is the planet itself.*

The use of macroeconomics and microeconomics and such silly terms are related to the taxes that are paid, the stupid and arrogant means to gamble a countries money and income on scandalous and hopelessly weak and feeble ideals, and in the UK the use of expanditive and contractual spending is often a battle with the ideologically driven politicians who fantasise one after the other, with the “bat and ball,” politics that, you can weave gold out of some old pillow cover, and the control of ‘government spending,’ can be archived by the use of controls from which the taxes are levied and the use of means to get the public to take control of all of their lives of which in most if not all cases they cannot since the costs would be well beyond that which they could afford and would only lead to more harm.*
So, Arnold & Maria you were asking about “Green Issues,”

The answer is really in the title, the notion of a cycle is the real truth that what ever you do, wash your hair fill the car with a tank of gas, (Gasoline), buy a TV set, open a food packet ra ra ra, its all the same regardless of what ever it is if you buy it, someone shipped it someone made it and all that involves energy, and process of any and all types all of this is based on the use of natural resources regardless of what it is, the lifestyles is a very important word, so is the lack of adjustment made here in the UK (as said we don’t particular approve nor does the UK speak for Konstance and the UK is no place for us what every you do in the home outside for or with anything, its all the same thing, somewhere something for some reason will all take a form from a resource, its not that a resource cant be used its how you use it that matters.*

So a legacy in this case is:

       1.    when you commit any action you create a legacy argument.
2.such a method, and a means will imply that cost to something or somewhere will occur.
3.The feedback must be correctly calculated, since if you consistently feed forward (the conventional western way) but don’t allocate, a specific, allowance, for data and monitoring, then you act to make a situation that cant be controlled and will only lead to more difficulty which the solutions and effectively outcomes may not be possible to deal with. (“cascade effect”)
4.In the calculated factors all the variables and variations have to be viewed, not just the main groups.
Same waste

   Same thing

     Same means of waste

  Factories

         Homes

      Industrial
Imports

 Why?
     Who says things cant be different?

A cycle and the addictive nature of what has become “lifestyles,” today is about the consumption of energy (the enforced or entrenched distortion of which brings the predisposed disposition of a cause to meet an aim, without thought as to consequence or planning), and resources, with little and in the case of the Brits absolutely little consequence to the references of which occurs outside of the shiny wrapper the by-products, the waste then the “psychology of acquisitions,” the lack of perceptions or the lack of the buyer to do anything anyway, since the politics of greed, gain, ideologically pals of trading partners and the need for control, is what is really the problems not just the gasses emissions that are so talked about.*

The test is what can the public reasonably be expected to, do, and what is plainly impossible, and if so, what can be done to change the way something or a means or a method is used.

Similarity what can the state do, and what can it have done in the first place.

:-: a published paper on this aspect of the “acquisition of gain” and “psychology, of acquisitions” was performed and was a finished work the outlet was not decided:-:

[[Konstance on Konstance]]

System wise (i.e. lets look at this from and extrusion that is, lets debunk the human none sense look at this from the outside), the use of “disconnections,” means in this language or lingo, that the “psychology of want,” is the driven aspect as in many countries that as in TV adverts all those with excellent dental care with fantastic lives and great make up and hair they are selling a lifestyles choice, the plastic great and the good the idea of that “for every lifestyles problem there is a product for that.” the danger is wither its that ugly old pair of curtains, or next years must have fashions there aren’t any indications of what happens after the product is used, or past its pre-determined MTBF often used to sell more, or that most plastic bottles and closures and such can be refiled but the obvious issue of washings and hygiene.  The psychology of want, is to say that you want so must pay with money for your wants, which in the corruption of the Brits means you then have a want, therefore a need so to which you need a goods, and a market a trade a supply train, then a sales vendor and a supply route and productions.*

[Konstance on Konstance]

How a lot of words is used and how calculated factors are performed away form the usual bunk of human logic and the silly idea that things happen and out of thin air, and that old chestnut on what life is and how in fact its really kept propped up]*

Its important to remember that when the overtly strange aspect system words (directly incorporated and signal loads or active systems which are self-generated and are associated with a known  issue or specific data issue or a specifically looked at event or are terms that are applied to a specific value allocation, are all “” or ][ or :-:) those terms are the original terms-meaning or those that Konstances would use in the concourse of conversion with any country of the world or any aspect where a matter is concerned, the key words are those that should be noted, in any case.  *

Forget conventional reasoning see, what's beyond

What this means is that for many reasons the weak or frankly unsustainable or unusable words in current use, or the aspects which are plainly wrong, or just way of the lines, needs real science and real knowledge to make the connections with others in a way that can be rapidly shown, to do this calculated factors have to be done in a frankly very un-orthodox route, forget conventional reasoning's and use something that can compute and can deliver real values and understand what things are and what they mean in a value or quantity.
The OK west society, the idea that the OK way of life is well OK but the way of life is failing and its not OK so look at why this is the issue:

Why do something about things that don't work, if OK will do?
Why make something better and more careful when dumping junk in the bin is OK
Why look at what could be done, and should be done, when just caring on with being stupid as mud is OK
why find a way to do something an easier way if OK will do?
Why think about things in a new light and act to do things better if OK will do?

The wasteful life is very OK, changing and educational and doing something a little different is the real words that people need to think about. Change doesn't mean you cant have it means to understand that what you do, is a risk and doing it another way that isn't OK is what you should aim for. OK isn't OK.

So in this case we can couple “lifestyle being driven,” with the ideologically driven nature of most modern western cultures in that the lifestyles are dependant on the resources that are then consumed as part of the “consumer led economy.”  So the dependency is there since the generations of people now and then, have become reliant on the aspects that such resources that fuel such are then taken on as is, so therefore the disconnection from which is the “resultantly of or latent echoes,” of are then really become either not something that people think about or just as usual don't care, or cant do much about anyway.*

Culture meets the mental state of implied want

So the gravity of the matter is there since its driven, by life, (culture, dependency, psychology, need, want for no reason, or understanding why such want is needed, control with such need, or wants, happy to server to get such wants as rewards for serving the need that is the driven aspect that those that want have no control of but want to gain what they desire even if they don't need), or the lifestyles that have become so dependency that the changes seem impossible or improbably but in fact changes doesn't mean don't do, nor don't have where the rest of the world in war torn or very poverty alike are unaware what the west really does do with all that oil, and where all that oil, minerals, and so really goes to, or for what. Similarly the disconnection from the west as how those in the rest of the world, its often the same.*

So “want and need” are really related to the important need to understand that outside of conventional reasoning as the aspects of “having” and the consequence of production of.

The Brits (British) the country like many countries of this type, size output and population stakes, this year more than any other have failed since the infantile outlook of GDP, banking and the economy has dominated the speeches from the politicians, whom also have a vindictive, attitude to the poor and those that are made out to be the blame for the mistakes and blundering idiotic, actions of greed and failure to have “fail-safes” on board, the mistakes, are clear and howl with venom, the facts are this whole ridiculous the replications of mistakes leaves indelible marks that often leave many in the hot seat where they ask how do they get out of that?  *

Similarly the UK and its contorted view of life, is that with all those votes up for grabs its important not to connect with those that votes really don't matter or in fact the attitude of the Brits is that those that don't matter wont have a vote or a say anyway as they canvassing members of parliament, or MP are only really interested in the core vote of those that they useless and frankly defunct policies serve, that is of course what the message of 'jobs, earnings, wages pensions derived from the business model that if you work for you old age your welcome the balance of trade, investments, and holidays and house ownership,buy a car own a home get a mortgage, pay for that buy this, its great you have to get a, you need a have you got a, this is it, you have to have that, ' is really a comparitor of the equation of that which compares to the nature of the society and its actions for those deemed 'normal,' and 'contribute,' those that don't or in the UK the “cant-work, wont-work,” and the consistent jibes at those that don't have nice clothes, a car ra ra ra are then seen as 'look at the state of that,' or somehow a “sub-species,”  so the life, and the state of things here in the UK is that to be something or someone or appear to successful or to be normal you then in turn use or live in such a way, mostly the GDP is derived from tax, and consumption and the trade in products throughout.*

The humans are most probably the most invasive, consuming everything wasting all, with the world, they have few thoughts as not being a parity, of which the endless waste and consumption is so fever pitch that its just awesome in its own rights, but its also important to remember that this obsession and fixation of gain and having is the key to the way that dealing with environmental problems and issues can be hot-fixed.  I want, and I am going to buy, I want that, I can have that, if its the old model I can dump it and buy an new one, that shoe is broken and cant be replaces the junk out of a $1 shop has blown up, lets dump and buy another one, lets not worry about not being to see that, I want a copy of that, I want, I want, I want, in the west its I, I, I want, want, want, want, ra ra ra ra, where is the case of need? Where is the case of what happens after? Where is the real life study, of what to do if, where does that go, when is it recycled and if its not recycled then what, where, who, and how do we find out, why build a house that heats up the night air? Why use something when its end life is toxic waste?*

Is the world on course to be one huge toxic waste heap with a dessert on each street corner and international ice berg towing operation?

How do you fix a planet if there is no planet left to fix?

The British like most of the developed world has governments, that can  prey on the weakness and the idea that to be something you have to have and this is used to great detail by politicians in the UK, the idea that this “fantasy island,” is a never ending merry-go-around, that is there for time and memorial, the waste is always gonna be there and if its not then something will have to be in its place the revolting and plainly arrogant nature of life here is that there is no disease, no famine, no war, no earthquakes, no lack of medicines, no lack of anything a right Royale, branch of fantasy and the words belched out of the canvassing politicians in this years whacked out election show case finial is the message of “vote for us and we'll wax ya butt with the promise of all things you like will go on and on,”etc this also with the resentment often and with which in the last few weeks is being ramped up by the politicians that those that are seen as spongers are therefore to blame, “for as blamed for talking the food out of the mouths of, hard working families,” this is the message behind the scene.*

So the phonetics of waste and lifestyles has a “key” to it, (a people are addicted to this way of living so is the key as to deal with its repercussions), as does how to deal with it, the simple changes that could be made may be put on the shelf if the gripes and whinging from politicians is that it will cost jobs, or the economy, yet the simple changes could make great impacts rather than the useless applications of which only see minor changes in which those amplifications of environment impact will only get worse.*

The flagship economy is the flag-stone, and heavy weight stumbling rock, that lands a fair weight to the continuation of waste, that is only there to sell an lifestyle.  The science of the environment was amply toyed with, since the science of climate change was given as to be an infective and un-reliable measure of anything, since the science or rather the key circumvention so always talked about is that change will take time and over time things will get worse but the likelihood of this is fought over with since top advisor's of the top scientists of the top university of the top people ra ra ra don't agree and wont agree there is of course a few questions none of these “top-advisor's,” cant answer:*

What If? 
What if you didn't have to live like that?
What if you could do things a new way?
What if when the oil runs out? What if the environmental impacts does make a serious problem?

“Amplification,” is not the same as climate change to amplify you continue to cause the environmental impact or core climate is the changed since the actions causes change the climate change is the resultantly of the action.  The idea for rejection of any suggested idea of change in any aspect is often shown in the EU or so it is claimed, that those gunning for power so it is so claimed under the banner of democratic process but if the west is so interested in conservation and modernisations why then don't they just well act? What is the issue over saying well we produce so much junk and all that junk has to be produces and what about all the waste from all those lifestyles?

And with the media in the UK for which that portion is definitely confirmed is that climate change is a myth, the same myth so supported at COP 15 the only myth is those that cant and wont, allow, or accept the idea that is very clear, the myth that nothing will happen is the only myth, the consistent and rapid use, of more and more non-replaceable fossil and prehistorically formed materials and the displacement of gasses into the larger body is only going to get worse what ever the skeptics say or come out with.*

I have heard all the ideas and variations on a theme and they are all the same keep on since there is no proven risk keep on since there is little chance keep on since the planet and its weather is colder now than it was keep on since global temperatures are now no different than they were since the thin line of records began a few hundred or so years ago. The bumbling scientists and the relentless cost to the economy the cost to jobs the rest and the all.  The fact is the western way of life the quest to get people to consume, and the endless waste and useless junk, that simply piles up and simply causes more harm than use is there, and what is the solution?*

As usual with the Brits is to do nothing, until it becomes a problem and when it does the public end up as they are about to under the next rotten set of politicians to loose out on those stupid ideals that will not make a single difference since it is clear, that the UK and its ridiculous British Society and its stupid idea that 'green,' or 'going green,' will somehow generate jobs and generate income but the whole problem of house building and the lifestyles, which depend on industry and use of energy and materials never seem to arrive in the equation. This idea of going green to be the new money spinner in a bankrupt land whacked out and only able to make the population suffer it seems for another season year 32, after 31 years of useless policies and promises will only make the situation worse and at the end not one useful change will have taken place.*

Take the attitude on water use, the lifestyles choices is that in the modern world everything is going to be done by a machine, which in turn creates a need and creates the use of energy and process, however the water that is so fought over and the rights to extract was based on water reservoirs of which were built 30 years ago and cannot possibly cope with the demand, the idea is that the public does not wash their clothes a washing machine does it, the lifestyles of those that don't wash a cup or a spoon or any cooking utensil they use a dish washer, they don't hang out the clothes to be dried they must use a tumble-dryer to do that. In fact instead of making water storage and more reservoirs is over taken by more profits and threats to pay for every drop while most of it is lost to leaks.  The Brits are so stupid that you have to have a water licence to and must pay extra to have a water-butt to catch the rain water?*

Here in old Blighty, (UK) there is that old problem of services, so in the mile from Paignton town centre to the outskirts of the cross over point from Paignton to Torquay there are now and counting 7 supermarkets mini-marts and shop de-rived supermarkets for which the newest one is only 300 yards away from another large concession of a multi national chain, and 10 yards from a mini-mart, bakers, newsagent, chemist, and other small businesses which in most cases in the bakery produce on shop the baked goods. But here again you can see that is not what the lifestyles choice is, that all that food, and all that food that is not going to be sold, so the small shops get cut out and muscled out with the idea that the public go to a multi-national chain.*

So the issue is here is what? No problemento, the issue is those supermarkets use distributions centres and road haulage where the local shops use local suppliers for their businesses, the clear evidence here shows that, instead of having a local production facilities the idea is that the shopper should pay way over the top for food that if it is not sold is then dumped, and that the sourcing is then from 50, 100 or 200 miles away delivered in large lorries that can only carry an amount of cargo, which then involved fuel, energy by-products and waste.*

So with all that the food itself, its transported in the worst waste of plastic, board card, packets full of chemicals  which all has to be stored at the correct temperatures in the right situations ra ra ra, most if not all the packaging is not recycled and is made of mixed plastics or that type of plastic that once contaminated it cant be reused, the most wasteful product of course is the plastic carry bag, which here in the UK there hasn't been any law or any plan to deal with that banning of something that is clearly waste. So you can see, clearly here, that food which of which is mostly fat and salt held together with glutinous and corn slurry, is then packed in plastic sold in plastic and carried home in plastic.*

The products sold in such supermarkets is mostly a mix of clothes, cheap rubbish, food that can only be eaten by the use of cooking ready to eat volatile foodstuffs that can only be held for a short while unless it is packed with chemicals and a huge plug on lifestyles, such as face creams, health and beauty products, hygiene and products as described as above for that lifestyles choices.*

What is the life that people really have now?

Plastic, plastic, oil, oil, and more the lifestyles of modern life are based on what the western culture is living on, and its living on what it cant put back in the ground yet has no desire to end the use of what is irreplaceable, still the harm that waste causes has become a record that with no real aims of those that use, dump, burn or use as a means to keep control and order, to further the lives that is the modern way of life and in the aspects of governments, the issue is when are such issues really if ever going to get debated and how much would the west or the “consumer led economies,” really be prepared to give up or loose such and if they do, what will the price be and the replacement for this come to?*

The life now is phantom, and is based on titles, use and misuse of the planet.

One for Maria Shriva!

Electrical and household electronics has become a massive business, so has the waste and the toxic by-products the issue is that if it makes money then as such its profitable, yet the consequence of this is what happens when all that useless junk often at the point of sale was just plain useless and was worthless to begin with where does it all go?  Mostly the use of 'no user serviceable parts,' solid state and the old chestnut 'non replaceable,' is a tale-tail sign that this junk and the reinventing of such junk, is there to be used and then dumped as there seems to be a significant lack of repairs, more over the dump it and then buy another useless junk item that will probably end up with the same failures.*

What ever the stupid terms used such as 'consumer electrical and electronics,' the key aspect is always missed in the text, 'consumer,' the aspect is that to consume you must first buy, use and discard what use is something that doesn't work and cant be repaired? - “its bin fodder.” or that is overdue for a dinner date with the dumpster, the fact is that waste is due to something that is being made that is clearly rubbish and cant and could not do what it said on the stupid wrapper and if it does after time it wont.*

So Maria, you were talking about the issue of electronic waste? Once electronics and there use was a fairly small and mostly a feeble affair but this industry has been bloated up with the use of such materials most of which are poisonous if they leach into the background environment, and we have not seen any national strategy to deal or standardise how such waste should be dealt with, the use of electronics has become fashionable and in many cases cheap and very cheerful the danger is that, the amount of production has gone up and amount of waste from failed cheap electronics has also, this is not a call to put up prices as that would disadvantage people, what the problem is that the conventional electronic components that are used are sold by the thousand as is .*

Often the consumer will buy on the basis of a brand name (psychology, and the idea that this product is hot, and the next big thing but did any of the purchasers ever wonder what happens to the old junk?)*

But a brand is not in fact in many cases made by that company, as in the Apple iphone and ipad fiasco which is made by Foxconn, so how many miles those that take? How much energy for a toy does it need?

But has the Apple branding and plastic case,) so if a resistor, capacitor, rectifier, chip, radiator, or heat sink, or a case, or plastic moulded body all of this all requires industry to make and assemble the products, the issue is that the products are made of such cheap and low MTBF or the amount of time before a burn out, given the use of conventional components rather than integrated circuits will then promote that act that people, do, it cost so much to repair or the products are built, so that they cannot be repaired or that the often the case is that such as Video cassette to DVD and so on there appears to be no sign of any national standardised factors built in what happens after the product fails or is beyond repair the plan here in the UK is often that the electronic waste which is toxic as it decays is then dumped into the bin, shipped aboard, or is the common practice is just broken up and dumped so that another product is then bought and often than not most of the large amounts of junk sold is useless at the point of sale often doesn't have the features or abilities that people wanted and often when broken is then the cost of which is for the customer now the consumer, to deal with.*

Most of the faults are “panel faults,” in that worthless junk and cheap components is defective or made in the cheapest method the fake use of QA or quality assurance which is often used to con the buyer that this is quality checked in fact only to the design specs that the company decided it wanted, the parent motherboard or some other factor has failed it is at this point that the waste often begins. The circuits and the nature of how they work is the reason for the failure, the transformer often the source of RF flux, and heat often is overloaded as the demand over time is increased, the x2 and other main stack capacitors have to deal with high flow of VDC from the VAC volts from the initial transformer, similarly the PU or power regulators and not to mention the cables often copper with thick plastic insulations with which can all be recycled, the next feed is the specialised sub-sets and systems of which all require repair if they break and often aren't. Chokes, RF coils, Zenner diodes Darlington arrays, gates, logic arrays, valves and so on like DIL (dual in line) chips, CPUs microcontrollers, and so on all take material and produce waste. Instead poly plated circuitry.*

In a conventional microwave oven the largest weight is the transformer, followed by the cabinet and condensers and the magnetron gun unit and glass turntable. The lack of development beyond the use of cheap materials in components, the lack of understanding that other ways of doing the same job as components that have a built in life pattern can be done and should be done, the failure of most if not all components and building electronic elements is due to the fact that its so cheap to use cheap rubbish in the build, that most junk sold in shops such as electrical wholesalers, which then have in most cases have no understanding of the build, the nature or in fact how to repair or fix the problem and most often only send the goods, for repair to some hack, who will sit there with little regard to the item and often the contractor or sub contractor is normally not even acquainted with the product in the first place.*

The idea of which is the action of using other materials is missing since the common electronic elements have a predisposed, predictably life pattern and depreciation or depletion ratio, however in many cases the mass shipping of products from over 3 to 5000 miles and products that are commonly over 6 or even 12 month old before they are ever sold only adds to the issue. The lack of repairablilty to stimulate a market, and keep the punters to buy more and more and the high cost of repairs is an issue that manufacturing has to deal with.*
In the old CRT type television set the most waste was the tube, now a days its all flat screens, computers is multiple integrated circuits and many smaller components, in tow, the whole aspect here is that most if not all the electronic items contains, items that can be recovered and either made safe or the materials can be reused.
Electronics 101
So we know that oil = plastic =  waste at some time and at some end, = what can be recycled what cant what was not recyclable at the start was what was junk from the start what is from the want and need cycle and what is the component of “psycho-mimetics,” this we know and we know that the integrated issue of life span, and lifestyles and the marketing, and pushing more and more production, of more products is then to push, more money, and more changing of products, but the use of oil into plastic and the toxic waste that is left behind has other problems, making something cheaply can be often not as sound as it may seem, the issue here is when you have finished with an electronic item do you know what is really in there?*

so we know that to make use of positive electrons, in a coherent bond in an atom we have to have several things:

Source either electromotive, (EF) on a specific band or frequency.
Conductor.
Dia-electric system.
Insulations.

Invoking, high technologies needed, and that the industrial processes and procurement will then leave an legacy argument and the latent event of what happens if the metal is recycled and the plastic isn't, what happens if the printing or the paint or the washings from this or the by-products go, what evaluations has the world done?
So the use of electrons has become the big deal in the electronics world since the can be manipulated, in a variations ways and means to power and to control as in a microcontrollers, or microprocessor, or a microcomputer. The use of more and more of this and the demand for more and more and the issue of the development of more and more to keep the re-invention of the wheel going we have to ask as you asked where does all that old models, and old junk go?

And how to recycle safely so that the toxic metals, and substances are not then conveyed to the natural environment?

Here you can see the age of the unit top, is much older than the plastic casing of the lower shell, by 1 year.

Here you can see that cheap, and feeble materials have been used the slightest error or liquid, spill or problem with the unit and the plastic screen printing would have to be replaced.
As particular to this workshop, you can see how the toxic legacy of using mixed materials can occur you can see that the PCB sometimes called a printed wiring board has lots of mixed materials on the sheet of plastic, substrate, or motherboard.

Here you can clearly see the facts, the  keyboard sold for £15.99 both the cheap and flimsy, and very weak design and very low specification look and don't get confused by the idea of Quality Assurance, since that is a badge that the manufacturer uses to con the buyer since that relates to the product and if it meets the idea and production outcome, in this case the product, had precise, and fairly accurate, aims, cheap and low grade, but has a Quality, Control which is not shown but would have had to comply to what he original manufacturer designed into the product as sold for, ($24.46) the cost of the product is very low and the manufacturing costs are almost none existent since 90% of the product is plastic, this shows the truth that the recycling data is on the inside and even if it was on the outside where does it go when its up for the bin?  The upper part of the keyboard is 1 year older than the plastic blow-moulded part of the bottom of the device. So although this keyboard was bought in August 2008 in fact on receipt of supposed new equipment and legally sold in a high street shop, as new, the upper part of the keyboard was made in May 2007, where the lower part is made later in May 2008.
Here you can see the infra-red unit, (TX and RX you can that this mouse is made from plastic and has metal parts microcontrollers and micro-switches, that are soldered into the plastic.
Here you can see the underside of the mouse in this case a cheap plastic mouse but you can see the optical chip and how it works.

So the question here is how much of this growing and fashionable, and very influential world of microcomputers is really about need and how much is really about want? Since as in the rest of the western world you have to have an electrical and electronic device to do most things, what happens when the developing world starts on this road? Again more want more waste so what will people do about that old model, how will the west act in the routes of how to deal with this issue and how will the world cope with most of the waste being either still usable or that the components still work or cant be recycled?
When Public Transport Goes Wrong

The claim has often been does public transport really take cars off the road, is it affordable is it safe and is it a Mecca for germs, viruses and above all safe to use at night?  The real issue is when has alternate transport other than as such most of the cars only have one inhabitant, going on a long or relatively short journey and if this is seen as just waste of energy what can the real alternates really bring, is it possible to walk to the destination? is it safe?  Are shoddy peddle-cycles more dangerous to the rider and the road user than they ought to be?  Is there a place for electrification lines for trams, do electric trains really need to have a live rail on all the time?  Are those crackpot inventions people come up with from time to time really that possible or some silly joke? What ever happened to the fantastic idea of maglev?

The real use of public transport is to have a secondary system, beyond the way that people have sadly become reliant on a car a commercial van due to the weight carrying capacity, or a semi-rig, or the airport ra ra ra, this is the real names of the real issues the real issue is can alternates such as a bus be any worse in pollution than a regular or irregular car trip?

In the case of public transport in any case a train, or a bus, there are only really in the modern western world two classes it either works, with good use and is practical and supports the user in their journey or it doesn't and is no use and is irrelevant to the user.  In the case notes again here in what we call un-lovingly “Grimpton on Sea, just off the A38 highway,” or motorway (UK), there is little use for public transport in the stone age, land that it is, so in the practical sense, public transport should be for all users regardless of the reason, however in practice it has become expense, dirty, a place most unsanitary, late, feeble in service lacking in number or some routes are just swamped with the users that get on for free, or the service has such a poor route plan or a route plan so long that the time from start to the bus station and onward is so long that the journey time is just beyond what people are prepared to deal with.*

[[map data required]]

Like most towns and cities the UK has that modern disease of being reliant on a car, and in some cases some jobs and some employers wont in fact employ someone unless they in fact are a car owner, in some cases the banks and some employers only will take a driving licence as the only form of proof that is the tariff of acceptance. *

So the old sessions of governments particularly the old UK ConserVATives had to sell the dreams of which those sucked into the dreams were to believe that the sale of the “families own silver,” the bus, the train routes the tracks all that would be the big answer to state ownership, in practice some state own property should be owned by the state to standardise the transport and make sure that the system of such transport would work, the ‘deregulation of buses,’ (the dream sold to the public under the old ConserVATives was a joke, in that competition was going to be the big deal in the end all that happened was dodgy businesses that own all the bus services and dreadfully over priced fares), since the old claim was that, it was a state monopoly, and as such this was uncompetitive what was often called a “super monopoly,” the accents are clear, in 2010 the greed of big companies in fact have resultantly produced a totally greedy set of companies that, in fact have only created super monopolies that in turn have put a stranglehold on cheap fares since the spineless Labour / ConserVATives have for the aftermath from 1989 had a yellow streak with the businesses that between them they helped to build, the consequence is that only a few companies own the routes, the concession to run the routes and in the case of Torbay $2,295,000 of tax payers money was handed over in a sweetener to a private bus company so that the same corrupt local council the 5 layer of crazed democracy, has then the right to use other whacked out laws to perform some other function the bus company then pushed up the fares and as such with it being a monopoly there is no comparitor or competitor to take on the firm and if they did they would have to have fares so low that it would be uneconomic for them to run the service with a gallon of Cetanes or Gasoil or Diesel, with huge tax on each gallon the greedy bus company passed that onto the passengers, so they could carry on greedily taking as much money as they could fill their greedy pockets with.*

The issue of a bus is that it is often roped in with high weight and costly machines such as the infamous double decker from the old Bristol VR of about 9 tonnes to the Leyland Atlantean, of about 10,160 kgs or about 10 tonnes to the Trident 2 of about 11 tonnes yet small Denis Darts and similar buses are still at the 7 tonne and 8 tonne margins, the actual need is to change the design and the specs from the start and to have a new setting in which those back seats leave passengers, leaning on the glass panes or those huge monsters in the US with huge builds and high weights, this new system uses a very different approach.

Similarly if a bus is to be a single deck with a low floor then it should be a low floor all the floor, and not have the raised platforms since the design was not correctly, noted for the engineering and the usual inconsequential location of most emergency exits, since most are occluded by a seat in the drive form more bums on seats, the matrix systematisation, using no chasis, and the wheels do have a difference and a differential size to which more of the rear of the vehicle is between the wheel sets, and the floors much lower and the engine if there has to be one, is more to do with a lower deck of a double decker bus, where the raised steps and platforms are not a factor, similar  is the suspension or air jacks commonly used for kneeling buses, since if you use 4, 8 or 12 link suspension frames, and other supplemental means to connect, those elements, and use monocoque, frames the overall weight of the bus is then a lot lighter than the older versions.

The deaths of rail passengers was the result of the privatised industry that only led to as is the case in the UK no one being responsible, and later on, more crashes and weak infrastructure is at risk again in 2010, since again the danger of ConserVATives and the repeat sale of dreams of public ownership can and often will cause more risks. People where killed in rail accidents due to negligence, and defaulting on safety issues all due to having a high dividend to share prices. The as then 1979-1997 and he current weak Socialists, 1997- did not open or make the fares across the country more attainable, or affordable, the lack of station provision and the missing cargo shipping and new lines, and development of new track and making simple track more direct and the common use of large haulage chains that are often the preserve of multinational companies and supermarkets only leads to more smaller loads being shipped by roads where a simple 400 tonne train can shift huge amounts of cargo faster and more simpler, a cargo train for long loads can move 100 lorry or semi-rig loads in one trip.*

So with expensive fares, fuel, monopolies the whole idea of public transport as a green alternative to car transport is fairly useless, similarly the greed and the stone-age land had lots of roads that could be made more wider not for cars but for electric-trams and of course there was the rail network, here there is a steam train, yes you did hear correctly a steam train that bought old BR or British Rail track about 8 miles worth and turned into a useless steam railway that only operates 5 months a year, since this is useless and causes more pollution with sulphur dioxides (NOX,) (NO2) carbon (C,) and the “expoliation” of particulates that are harmful to the lung and inhalation intakes, fumes carbon than over 150 cars in one week it is a joke.*

  Do politicians ever understand why old ways and old controls never work?
     What do they know?

        Is government more important that interest in modernisations?

Up to recently the use of pulverised coal power generation stations or power stations dumped massive amounts of sulphur onto cash crop lands, now farmers have to dump massive amounts of artificial fertilizer since the amount of crop per acre that is required to make the seeding and the tending of such crops is huge the nitrates then leach into water courses, even silage effluent, the old means of making money out of milk is now taken over by greedy dairies, and supermarkets that demand higher profits from lower cost per litres, cows are made to produce longer, and need more food, the production of electrical energy, electrons, has gone up, the waste of electrical energy has increasingly been made worse with the use of poor energy efficiently, using more, where the use is really only for recreational use, as is most of the actions in a homelife.

After pulverised coal, comes the need for mines, the use of pure carbon, the use of open cast mines, the use of gas powered stations, wasting crude by burning it, directly roads use more metal, rock and tar than any other use of the same materials, electrical cable is a massive waste of plastic, industrial plants use huge amounts of energy, nuclear is blamed for being too risky, water is hardly ever used, hydrothermic was not ever really seen as viable, where using gas, propanes, methanes, and alike, using fractioning towers instead of planning what to do next in the energy stakes.8

Similarly the spineless UK wont open any rail or tram routes along the old track bed since it is more interested in golf course, weed patches and refusal to build anything modern since it would change the landscape or spoil someone’s view, so the route from Brixham (or what we call “scruffham,”) the really tiny hamlet, the only route from that town to Paignton is by car or the bus, there is no other way. This is replicated from Paignton to Totnes, or rail from Torquay to Totnes, or the old routes and lack of road modernisations by-pass and link roads, since the older roads cannot cope with the stress load and cannot cope with the massive buses often 11,100 kgs or the 40,640 kgs articulated lorries that such roads are just not made for, so the accent is here have problems that no one wants to deal with and creating more problems that can be solved but aren’t.*

There are millions of miles or road, there are hundreds of thousands of rail, aircraft fly out of most airports every 90 seconds, most of the green house gasses are water vapour that reflects infra-red radians. Solar flares and plasmic cycles (sun spots and magnetic events) and prominences on the star, cant be in effect blamed for the use of damage done by emissions, and it is up to the people on the planet who, can amplify the effect if the rate of discharge is so high that there is no way for the planet to deal with the consistent rate of absorption, the amount of particulates that the ambient atmosphere can absorb is the resultantly event of emissions of noxious gasses, to which then have to be dealt with by the planet.*
So the lack of vision and the lack of coordinated services and the drive to push public transport into the ground is a lack of insight into the amount of car journeys that could be saved. So the moral is a lack of insight investment, controlled running, monopolies, expensive fares useless routes, bad road planning and weak infrastructure makes the whole idea of bus travel simply un-workable.  The tram use, could be very viable here since there is more than plenty room to accommodate the routes.*

The use of the car has been fuelled with little or no regard, and the massive plans for more parking lots, (Car Park UK) or the use of “out of town shopping malls,” that study only shows that such actions are only for the car owner, to go there and shop more and spend more, the asset stripping only emptied the town centres and the lack of planning only at this count has 600 empty shops that no one can make into any type of businesses, since the car has taken all the shoppers out of town to greedy multinational chains that want to hoover up more of the remaining Torbay area to suck all the money they can out of the area and the approximate population of 150,000 (nominal) since in the summer season from April 1st to October 31st the area is bloated by foreign students coach parties that are the new holiday maker since no families or family friendly services are here, and the bloat that the area cant cope with only puts more cars on the road since the public transport cant cope. *

Similarly the use of cars only then puts more use of the tarmacadam and metalled roads which then wear out much faster only then putting more cars on roads and tight lanes or “rat-runs,” that clearly cannot cope with that volume of traffic in the first place.

The most puzzling factor has to be town planning since the rotten concrete and joke design of the buildings is something from a comic surely. Similarly the use of the materials and engines that are used, the old type of 2 or 4 valve cylinder systems and the low crank yields from the TDC and exothermic burn cycle after which the driven stroke and bore factors seem to make no difference in the overall MPG the higher the litreage the higher the fuel use, strangely the high output and the fuel is not really a consideration when a car, van, lorry or farm equipment is used.* 
How much horse power do you need?

   What fuel do you you use in one year?

    How much fumes and exhaust gasses does that produce?

Where do those fumes actually go?

            How much of the water vapour can the world tolerate?

Oddly the car user is commonly blames for most of the road use and fuel use, yet the cars seem to get heavier and heavier, and more and more complex, alternatively the van use or lorry or truck use seems to be un-scaved when it arrives at the high end engine use, since as like a bus the consumption of such engines is weak and commonly uses engines with 8, 10, or supercharged 12 piston-pot array designs that occupy 300-640 horse power designs that have massive litres in the design from 12,000 bore/cc/per pot, up to 16.0 litres that is then divided upon the stroke and bore factor over the per/pot load such as 8, 10, 12 array. Similarly the use of farm machinery has become so huge that 4 wheel drive is now the norm and the engines commonly based on 3, 4, or 6 piston-pots (often 3,000 kgs to 9,000 kgs in weights or “kerb weight” wet), use such massive allowances for output that some engines range from 3.0 up 8.9 litres for a common 6 piston-pot cylinder block. The lack of power to weight and “power-matching,” only then produces a large machine that a similar or alternative method could be used similarly is the issue of air travel the massive increase of air travel fruit and food for the western supermarkets being flown in to keep up the supplies and demands adds to the issue of pollution.*

hydrocarbons are Hydrogen (H) and Carbon, (C Diesel has a higher Carbon rate than Petrol or Gasoline since its more to the Hydrogen side of the scale.

This is a very common type of recycling label, the problem is and should be noted where do you recycle? And the other question is who actually knows, and how do you take huge mountains of rotting cardboard boxes, plastic bottles, and old food cartons, to a recycling site? Not of course that there is any, since what facilities are provided, the UK is again lame in this aspect, since in fact its more happy to burn, or bury, and then say that burning releases energy to heat homes, and provide power what a pathetic waste of material since the efficiency of making use of materials or in fact not using materials that in fact cant be recycled or have become contaminated with matter or material that means they cant be sorted or re-used.*
So, did going green really go mouldy?
Down town Paignton, actually Church Street, you can see the 1890s 1930s onward, buildings to the right, with no green or heat control or any type of solar or any other type of green technologies in use. To the right buildings over 100 years old, and old sights that have weak design.  Most if not all the shops in the town centre are not shops, they are converted buildings not designed or even meant to be used as a commercial premises, still most of the shops are empty, since the UK has a failure to deal with greed, since in the pictures below, you can see, that in fact large corporations can build their shops, and supermarkets anywhere thus affecting directly, the small trader, which in the moronic hellish vision of the CONserVATives, that sort of does in the idea of private entrepreneurs.*

Here is the proof of poor street planning and useless shop design. To the right is a junk shopping mall with empty shops, no energy efficiency of any kind and a very poor layout. This also shows that the roads actually plough straight throw the shopping area, instead of re-routing the cars, buses, semi-rigs, (42 tonne articulated lorries, UK) around and away from the shopping area, they circle like vultures. So you can see, that useless buildings, useless street plans and stupid businesses are in fact what the town centre is really about.*

So a lack of foresight, a lack of control, and a defaulting sense of property ownership, hanging on to the past, a lack of interest in building sound buildings with real interactive and self-management of energy system is the real sight that is in sight.

Oh look the first green signs its a flower bed.
State capitol building Sacramento USA not so green.

Long beach California not really that green or energy efficient.
Definitely very green that would be the large plants growing out of this typical London street.

They spent millions here and look that new multimillion pound building, for the tax stealing members of the UK parliament, not a green iota in sight. So we can conclude that with all the formats, proof and all the details summed up that going green is a conception that no one is either really interested in or has taken any steps to do, act on or even have a clue on when and where. Building those offices with not any sense of what is the use of it, how will it be used what energy is going to use?

Going Green really, did go mouldy.

Tractor Footprints, Soil Erosion and all that
In the end Konstances final conclusion was that farm tractors could be modified and correctly power matched rather than the over use of heavy build for relatively field basic actions such as seeding, sub-soiling and basic field operations, the huge hulking monster vehicles in many cases had defective brakes, or brakes that did not work correctly used universal tractor oil that was so wasteful did not comply to the hydraulic standard, used poor pump methods and had a very weak design or a design that was clearly a detrimental effect to the driver or the land it worked on. The risk of “plough panning,” was because the mis-understanding by the tractor industry mostly swallowed up by AGCO, and the lack of synergy, with working with the land and a sheer lack of automatically controlled draft and relief valves when working with undulated land really only added to fuel consumption and soil loss since the soil itself simply blew away in the stupid actions of common land farming.*

The last tractor design was finished years ago and it was the last time that Konstances own review of the stupid nature of agricultural machinery worked and its synergy with the land showed that the vehicles and moronic way that the land implements worked was so primitive that unless they were redesigned they could not be enhanced further since the farming world wanted ever larger and heavier and more fuel burning machines that did little more than the older machines did in the study group from 1945-1995.*

Tractors have to be power-matched since ok, yes a roller or other dumb implement will push the tractor down a hill causing skid marks ok, but a heavy vehicle should be power matched since the ploy for bigger and heavy vehicles for small farm and small operations really is not all its made out to be.
The final aspect of wheel-slip, drag, and lack of accurate automatically sensing sub-systems that could map the land beforehand and alter the applications of power distributions and implements height and the clear lack of mechanical expertise was the real problem that was always fixable. The supposed ‘fully floating,’ 3 point hitch system was a joke, the original rule over time that the vehicle should carry not drag the implements was replaced by huge engines and huge soil erosion problems.*

  Agricultural

           Cows

   Plastic

  Fuel
Crops        Gasses

So to feed you have to seed, the issue is that involve huge swards of land the more land the more food, the more energy the more power the more vehicles needed, the issue is that as soil is vital so is the issue that using means to grow things the means to seed the means to condition those crops all requires energy, in one form or another.  If farm machinery can be modified and made better it is at present the old weak design.

Soil erosion and the lack of trees and hedges and the sheer lack of understanding about the design flaws continues, today, the problems of poor engine design and the simple task of using planet gears to shift the clutch from the engine body compartment to the rear of the vehicle and combine the power take off in one enhanced compartment was a simple change and a simple speed and directional sensing fore-mapping was a real aim that was achievable.*

Soil erosion and the lack of understanding how the land worked and how the water supply system and the push to make more and more food, for the action of getting EU subsidies in the food mountains and wine lakes while most of the UK in the poor groups did not received the food, nor from the milk lakes and so on and the lack of innovation for farming has left most of it in ruins, the danger of privatised milk marketing board and the very shoddy way in which farmers are paid for milk in bulk tanker values is the again the lack of any understanding what can be farmed and what land is needed for farming and the idiotic politicians really never understood how land was used and what should be done for planning for climate change and how this would affect “cash-crops,” production and animals use for humans to consume or use and the way that humans abuse for milk and other uses.*  The lack of understanding what was going on and the reasons for this is still a factor that land planning and any change of climate how this could affect the sweet climate of the northern European landscape or the risks that such damage could cause to the lands of Africa or other landscapes that would be the first to fall if the planet really did start to have a serious problem with land water, and soil erosion and desertification of which would choke the ability to support life. In the UK the soil simply blows away revealing the sub-soils and “clay platy,” that only will make farming more difficult.*

The Lack of Town Planning

So we know that the “driven economy,” is really in many cases the source of GDP, since we know that a lot of but not all tax and spending funds is derived from the “consumer led economy,” so we know that a fake believe that people are brought with from the cradle to the grave is that “products,” and the addictions are more important to people, than planning for which how to deal with the matters that of course will only cause problems later on, so we know that the “unsustainable or improper reaction,” of waste, and want and the “psychology of acquisitions,” with no “aforesighting,” or any type of “crash prevention protocols,” or the lack of feedback or “specific value allocation,” for response analysis or similar or “iRES,” this is the mess that the fake idea after Kyoto and COP 15 is failed under the weight of world economies, business, and the wealth in work regimes so popular with most of the western world.*  The sum is always the same, the consumer consumes then goes out and consumes again which then requires a chain, an process a trade a sales pitch, loads of nice adverts with people with excellent dental care, a supply network a supplier money, imports and exports, vendors and producers, so we know that there has to be a sales point to feed the addictions.*  In a public building how much energy is made or lost throughout the access and exits?  The use of “flow-control,” is a real science that deal with the issue of building design and how the building is to be used, and for what purpose is that building to be designated for and how many users will occur, the other issue of construction and the use of power and the use of energy has to be there from the start which can include:

Cooling units.
Heaters.
Electrically operated doors.
Escalators.
Elevators or lifts.
Lighting.
Electrical devices.
Incidental lighting.
Interior and exterior electrical devices (misc).

To debunk the myth a bit more ask yourself, if you live in a hot climate such as California, and as such customers require cool shops to shop in, and lights abound, how will you power that? Could you use energy recycling, could you use solar power to run or help to run the interior lights or incidental lights?  Similar to water flow and water pipes, and a lot of systems like this could you use waste water pipes to add small amounts of power? Could you use massive water mains to a city to provide a bit more or gravity tanks on tall buildings to help further ask yourself how much of that building could it help to power itself?
Interactive buildings and self power management buildings are real and can work!

What makes a town in the common sense a town, what makes the reason for shops and those premises to sell things?

 What drive the building of such? Why do you shop and what do you shop for?

Some say that there are hundreds of years of oil left how much time then does the world made out of oil left and people to find a new energy source?

There are 7500 photos, evaluation shots, data streams and photographic evidential materials you can see, that the west is about selling the dream of endless waste, all based on oil, all based on waste, here you can see typical supermarket buildings, weak poor, and futile street plans, and the way that people are expected to live and the consequence of waste.*

So here you see the truth, the street plan in the town, the old shops with heaters and coolers, and the idea that huge shops are there to sell, the lack of any green equipment, the next shot shows the effect of waste the dumping, the throwing of junk into a gap in a wall, the cheap and tatty, the next shot shows, the cheaper side of the shops the junk that is junk to start with the huge warehouse supermarkets the massive building that throws out the food that it cant get money for, the ease to waste the way to buy more the shopping plastic vest style bag, the old streets in the other shot, the new mini-supermarket that is effectively made out of cheap materials, knocked up fast to pile em high, the Torquay line of shops over 1 mile long, junk tat, the old mouldy town of Totnes, the look of age waste is easy waste is everywhere waste is easy to do.*
Interactive Buildings

So we know that town centre planning with fire and rescue access and the “flow-control,” the throughout throughput of people and safety concerns for side walks (pavement coated in flag stones or asphaltenes, and kerb-stones UK) must also be a factor, however the use of energy and the number of sustainably  suited and sited shops, and commercial operations is the key factor, since the mixed shops and those shops that belong in a mall, are missing in many issues, “the Sprawl,” or what we call Torquay, right so the town in the common human terms is built in such a stupid way that its lack of expansion prospects and lack of foresight often causes more issues than can in fact be dealt with, the common theme in most towns and cities is that the town or whatever is there to provide access, and services and, is set up in a way that most of the businesses are there to be seen and attract the punter or shopper to shop and buy more of the same type of items that they then are labelled the consumer.*
  Clean

   Able to generate power from solar
Interior lights
        Recycle the energy

    lights that dim when no one is at home

        Don’t heat up the night air
So using flow control we know that a large volume has to be catered for and that such flow rates will occupy a slow mix or a mix that is consistent in what they do and fairly predictably in what area they occupy. In a study case with the rotten state of “Grimpton on sea” the (Paignton Devon, “real face of grim”) there are old rotten buildings, that should have been “multiplexed,” which in this case is an enhanced way of combining and compacting a lot of small units into a building that is modern had an energy management system and is more better to conserve energy throughout rather than the old defunct and the dozens of empty shops since the small businesses are gone with the stupid lack of development hanging on to stone-age junk, and that sense of heritage and clinging on to the past, with which the predictably  decay in the buildings was that the construction was from mostly 1970-1980 so most if not all building is in fact 30-100 years old even some railway bridges are 100 years old, including the stations they serve.*

So we have buildings and shops that serve a need the need to want and the need to consume, they use energy poorly since the heating is often just blown out into the night air and is commonly on all day and all night so is the lighting and the air conditioning even if the shop is closed, the traffic is so close to the areas designated for shopping that the gassed public are consistently breathing in fumes, with the moronic set of street plans that is then looked after by the force payment on the tax payer for useless CCTV that is only really used to pick on people as seen with tacky clothes or in the lingo of the UK ‘a bit shifty.’*
Its so simple its like riding a bike!

The issue of modernisations is not about sweeping away the past it is living in the past that starves the future a lack of controlled planning the reliance on customers and the stupid idea that by car everything is done, by car is how people live and the by car is how families shop this axiom is the danger that is only going to cause with the reluctance to multiphase things and to plan correctly how the public actually use the environment by the means of flow control, how the public interact (“synergy, use and how buildings respond to use”), with the places they go, and the flow rates and conditions that affects flow.*
And interactive building whether it is a single storey or a column type with more than 2 or 3 floors in the unit, should be interactive this increasingly will improve flow rates, and help people to find what they want, the action of modern “self-energy management” will help conserve energy with simple basics such as “self-dimming lights” if no customers are present or in such low or few numbers, heat and solar actions to light up dark areas in daylight zones will increase the energy of the building, simple things, simple adjustments simple to do and no cost involved!!!

Solar panels and wind turbines could be used to provide indoor lighting as is the norm in shops.

Its like Lego but just a bit bigger!

The choice of building type and building materials is most important the service life and durability is the key factor using inefficient and cheap building materials is the real danger since an industrial building the type most likely to be a steel-framed type with single line or often large glazed panels is most likely to be and energy waster with all that lighting, lack of flow control and a sheer lack of energy management and energy preservation and poor insulations.*

the average cost of a home in the UK is £250,000 but its not made out of £250,000 pounds worth of material, so built for profit, not being built for mass housing, or the poor, or for rent, or for any really useful aim other than a product, that is there to serve a need to make money, but not much else.  So we know that the common house building tactics are based on the set of housing materials and building standards that neither support the idea of energy control or use, or is that ever really built into the means the method or the application of how the building is constructed from start to finish, since how can a building built out of horror materials from which uses energy to which neither conserves any, nor in fact makes any?

The issue is climate and use, the common use of a home is recreational, often businesses and mostly for sleep, so you have a huge canvas and platform chock full of things and lots of things and trappings of life, which uses energy, and the more colder or hotter the place you live the more you want, the more you need, the more your home consumes the more you have to do more to get that need turned from a want to having.

Houses for people don’t work since they are not built in a way that can deal with the changing needs or can be adaptive enough for the rugged and often harsh weather or the issues with the climate and the co-efficient of the two relationships. Building something is not about slapping down a few bricks is what is that building over its use and operations run time is that building going to consume or the level of which that building can save or monitor the use of energy while the occupant is in, asleep or otherwise?

What type of building materials is you home built from?

Debunking The Science

In going green we ask, and show that with all the big cheeses on the international circuit, and all that COP 15, Kyoto, language, we show that in the UK there inst any green attributes, ways of reforming wasteful lifestyles, practices or any means of any kind, that could make one single difference to what, energy, use of natural resources and the control of the planets environment considerations is in any way shown, mentioned or planned for, in June 2010 the current moronic government is only interested in capitalism, and how to get the punters wasting the resources and energy again, since waste equals their profitable businesses and an assurance that such greedy businesses will cough up again to fix the next election. (Part 3 has the longer version of this)*
Why is the climate so hard to get to grips with?
Lets debunk the myth in this last part, what is a climate and what is it so much of a row? So the climate is in fact the troposphere the habitable bit between the fired up inside of the planet and the cold of space. This life sustaining factor is a small and relatively weak and very unstable zone, that is to affect easy to be wrecked and very easy to become in a state that the life it supports is unable to remain, so a lax, poor and relatively useless zone that has to maintain a steady temperatures and relative zone to support the biological forms in that zone. So we know therefore that life as it is seen is an very shockingly unstable and very fragile state, that a tip in a possible or negative vault can affect what ever is reliant upon the features and characteristics that are in part with the zone.

So the weak and relatively pointless temperate zone is there but its generation, is from the gasses that are in a consistent state of flux, and to which are maintained by electro-magnetics.

So right away you have:

A planet with a core that is kept hot since that the planet spins, due to magnetics, or other forces that caused it spin, the heated molten core is hot since the heat from the radiative body, or parent star is consistent, above that is the cooler sections until you reach the outer most level which supports the biological.

The biological, then contributes to the preservation of the ambiance Oxygen source since its is derived but all of it is by this method. The gas level in the atmosphere has a static pressure predictably scale that the hotter it is, affects the amount of liquids and other gasses behaviour, similarly the characteristics of gasses is also a matter to see how much of pollution gasses which is a gas in motion can be saturated into the large gas mass.

Gas will act in the way that the magnetics and the heat and the cooling of them to expand and to cool in accordance to he amount of energy that is applicated into the gas volume.

The real drive at going green is to test accurately, what is the effect of background events such as volcanoes, or other events natural such as space or the parent star?  Similarly what is the portions that are synthetic in that, what is the amount of gases and particle emissions that the animal population pollutes and the amount of saturation that the ambient gases fractioning can absorb over time and is this accumulative or is the a steady up load to which what does the planet do to manages the amount of gasses and particles that the use of Carbon, and the creation of more water vapour from hotter seas, hotter land, and more and more means to cause Infra-red radians to be kept in the atmosphere, since the amount of heat being kept is more than naturally would bounce back out into space.

So the test is:

What effect does the actions of pollutions act on the characteristic of the gaseous mass or atmosphere?
What amount of management can the planet safely act on this?
What is the total amount of saturation displacement from synthetic sources such as carbon burning or oil use can the gaseous mass deal with?
Displacement, is the suspension of a particulate from carbon or fossil fuels that has then become diluted into a larger mass so that the energy then created does not vanish it is then absorbed into the larger mass. Those that don’t believe really should note exactly how displacement, actually does work and what happens when amplify or modify the characteristics of a body from which you add or dilute or make that body have extra features than it would do, and how this can affect what is reliant upon the gaseous mass and how this can affect what the troposphere in turn supports.

Energy is energy once its out of the bottle you cant put the genie back in the bottle, so burning fossil fuels is a means to use stored energy from the prehistorically live period or from trees the energy stored is then released the carbon fuels then permeate the gaseous mass and the particulates have to be dealt with, so does the hot steam, flue gasses and alike the accent on heating up the worlds oceans can mean that a hotter gas mass is then created. If in the stable water mass you heat it up you then in turn the water into, gasses, the amount and this is becomes in itself a green house gas. The hotter atmosphere then affects the amount of water in the atmosphere.

So the test is what is heating up the atmosphere, what part is natural from the planet and its actions and those from the solar system and local galaxy.  So what can affect a planet? This is in two categories local and distal.

So the things to remember are:

Event.
Energy.
Source.
Amount.
Displacement.
Absorption.
Saturation.
Dissipation.
Transmission/ Transpose.
Outcome.
Secondary factor.
Amplification, the means to add additional energy by the use of carbonaceous fuels.

The planet can be affected by:

Orbit (rotational) +/- speed.
Distance from the parent star +/-
Yawing, pitching, rolling, annual pole shift, (winter/summer).
3rd orbit rotations (geo spacial or gyroscopic).
Axial pole rotation.
Pole jumping (planet poles shift or alternates).
The parent star.
Solar weather.
Exothermic reactions of the star.
Other planets.
The moon.
Solar system rotations.
Galaxy rotational on a axis.
Galactic expansion.
Heating and cooling of the water masses.
Volcanoes.
Pulling and pushing.
Geomagnetics.
Solar eruptions.
A-particle radiation.
B-particle radiation.
Gamma.
X-rays.
Microwaves.
Geological event 1 (subduction zone event).
Earthquakes.
Water increase water decrease.

The Synthetic route:
The use and combustion of carbonaceous and nitrogenic chemicals.
Particulates.
Smog.
Fumes.
Steam.
Hot flue gases from combustion.
Burning.
Coal.
Oil.
Exhaust fumes.
Households.
Infra-red.
Industry.
Manufacture.
Agricultural.
Recreational.
Power generation.
Mining.
Open cast coal mines.
China clay extraction.
Mineral extraction.
Metal ore extraction.
Iron and steel manufacture.
Goods and production plants.
This list shows how all of these factors differ from the previous one in this case they are all connected.
Part 2

Debunking
The
Myths
And

Now

You

The

Secrets

Finally

Revealed
In Part 3:
Experiment IV
Experiment 8

I Robot

Project Ratcatcher, January, 1st 2001 to December 31st 2003

Please note this is a very long document and we have performed a read through, as such at this time some items were so long in nature that we could not in this case add in this work however we will send the remaining items on June 20th 2010 which will cover all the items above. If there are any errors they may have been missed and if there is any confusion or mis-spellings please let us know. Although this item has been checked for mistakes or errors, any error is by accident and please correct as needed.

We hope that you enjoy reading this document and if you want to use the content at G20 or to change the views on capitalism, waste and the environment then the data above may help in doing that.

To contact us:

Breaking the mould

Hello! Well here we are following on from the last chapters we see now how everything that has been looked at, considered and thought over how this data and the nature of the world can be changed or altered or clear details of what happens if the world lives on denial, and fear and the grip of greed, and lack of foresight.
Nothing

will

be

the

same

ever

again
The spirit of this technology, is to ask the question who says that things always have to be the same?

The essence is to make real technology, and make it available today, in a form that works and in a method, that can be implemented, and the upstream views on what the future problems relate to now and what can go wrong further on, if events are not acted upon, simply, changing the past is about saying those who live in the past always starve the future, so, with the movement away from the conventional, and releasing this set of technical papers as part of Series 4 “the dark blogs,” this changes the views of those that live in the stone-age, and want to hang on to method, or actions since that serves the arrogant purposes that maintained those positions of being recalcitrant, of the mind of, rearward, recumbent on finding new ways to do things, totally lacking, unrepentant of waste and disconnected and dispassionate about subtle and more, up to date, more objectively seeking a new forum a new sense of direction over those that dwell in retrogressive status rather than, retractile and thinking about, a more declaratives, and fortitude and advancement caravanserai, and seeing solutions as altruistic, and striving for annotate and, adaptability, and interventionist.

Series 4 the dark blogs

Well lets see what we have already looked at and what is left, to do, the world is full of dreams, and claims and counter claims and with this chapter let us leave the world of blinding people with bafflingly long details the targets, and characteristics and objects should be change, but not in the way that is objectionable, nor for which is hated since those stone-age characters oppose since the end of greed, negligence and greedy bankers and the consumer led world would be affected. 

Its never too late to do something its only ever too late when you don’t learn and act in time. How and why, is a means to carry a country, a state, or a continent if you practice the correct way to perform what you want to do or aim for.

But if you didn’t when the world had the option to change and failed, and had the option but did not use it,  and then ask what then now, would leave those in the world with little aims left and you cant recourse what is then the answer? Unification and not leaving people behind counts a lot.

Beyond the old world – breaking the mould

The world today is not an everlasting, way of life, and if the way people live, and are expected to live, refuse to change, cant do anything or its simply impossible the real issue is the real test and the real way to do things what has never ever been done, for real in the public world is the tests and the plans, from groundwork to the final outcome of the resolutions, even if opponents of breaking the mould, try to challenge or make such alterations fail, or try to interrupt, the facts is the details that cant be hidden, cant be covered up and cant be lied about, in the UK their time will come, they live in blindness, and arrogance and rely on controls illegal laws, rules and using the people the poor, and the greed to keep the small group in Westminster out of the firing line while they prey on their own people until they crumble as in the banking crisis, if you see, or when you had the ability acted, then the self-defeating outcome is more about those that simply fail, and I hope that the errors and the failures when they crash and pancake into the ground with the latest double or nudge gamble I hope and trust I can be a long way, a way when that mistake comes home to those that still refuse to alter, or make any one change that come make a difference in any way or in any small way.

The fatal mistakes are indelible, and the outcomes tend to smash, the tax payer, the voter really hard, the world that depends on money, addictions to money, the lifestyles, the reckless waste since waste is OK in the mind of those that want it, so why do something different if OK is er OK the mistake is to go on and on, as they do in the UK but when it arrives at actions they make mediocre words but wont do the job as well, talking is ok, but the walking is the other end of the job, the test is “the way of life, and how long can that way of life be supported?”
Why find a new way to save heat in the home if heating up the night sky is OK, why find a way to use transport if some gas guzzling car is OK why save on fuel, or materials use if going to the mall to buy the next load of bin fodder is OK, doing is making, not doing is leaving things as they are and the endgame will come, what is done now, can change the outcome, failure to see that, or act on when the choices could be made “crash preventions protocol,” and allow things to concertina, in the end, will lead to a crash with no possible means to “recourse.”
So the key words shown are the correct way to make changes they are:

Recourse, the means to swap or change a route, or if, such as an error occurs to make-safe, and alter the route so a crash cant occur and if so, then have a route out of the mistake from which the same error is then prevented.

Crash preventions, see an error learn its constraints, and exponents, and plan not to make that course as it will only lead to a concertina that means as in the recent news when things end in a “bad ending,” what will be left when a change could have been made and collisions were and could have been made what will be left.

Groundwork, the real work in any means to plan and then make a decision  is to plan the groundwork, this is the real hard pain staking work but its not about a grind nor is it really being hard, it can be done, if you step-sequence the way you want to do, how you intend to do that and what you aim to do, and the effects of what this will do.
So, systematisation, planning routing, channelling, stepping it doesn’t matter if its changing the type of plastic used, or the way that money is used, or energy or some other problem is always done this way, breaking a large element of a component or modular integrated factor into small pieces and work logically, in a unified way, and divided the whole into smaller groups means you can then assemble a stack that you can run and if the sequencing is wrong or the calculations or the means and method don’t work its easy to fix the issue. The real understanding is if something is pointless, doesn’t work and is a failure from the start or something is put into bat, what is the point in doing it?

Remember why do something different if doing something pointless is OK, why change the way you work if the old way since its the old way and effective is OK, OK is OK for those that want that, but if the outcome of being just OK means nothing in the outcome then why do it?  What ever the issue quantification, practice and constraints and exponents, of a factor calculation of the error and the actions to correct old errors is the real aim if you don’t understand why something doesn’t work how then do you fix it?  It doesn’t matter if its the fuel used by a bus, or the amount of air travel or the amount of coal out of the ground if its not correctly looked at tested and followed then you have no data and no pattern or signal or inspiration to follow.
Change is inevitable and its going to happen one way of the other.  In the endgame evolution of the old errors will occur.

How long can the same errors not be picked up how and what can be done:

1.Groundwork, weak and poor foundation work is lead to collapse since the column of weight standing above cant be supported.
2.Testing and evaluation.
3.Melting the ice on changing lifestyles.
4.Upstream what is the next way of living.

So not rhetoric, not long films and lots of boffin trying to burn a hole in the head, the real test is understand how, the problem occurs, the nature of the issue, what it does, what is driving it, and how the effects are noted, and the feedback form the mistakes take form and shape, and what is the blocks that prevents by natural or deliberate and intentional, blocks to suit narcissistic interests where the grab for cash is more dangerous when lives and countries are at stake. No one should ever say it doesn’t affect them since the world, its future, its consumption of energy, the waste and the pollution does and will no one should say, that peace cant be affected by waste, or loss of the means of that waste, no one should pretend that they don’t know, and those unable to make or cant for what ever reason change or alter what they do, how they do it, and what effects that causes there are background ways, or indirect ways to solve problems that occur or are being driven.
The real mandate should be:

5.To see the connection from source to demand to the outcome of what is driving the energy waste to the waste from lifestyles.
6.Looking for the main indications of which can be stopped or altered in such as way that a comprehensive relief can be found or that such waste is limited to the least.
7.Being real the “reality check,” what is possible in the current climate and what is not.
8.Being the driving force and using the “adaptive route,” to unify what to do, why, and most importantly when.
9.Be sure to understand that changes in any way, can amplify other factors, and such alterations once done cannot be undone, and the realisation not of silly ploys, or those with crank inventions but actual and whole stepping sequencing.
10.Not leaving people behind, or outside of this event, since if people cant catch up then they will end up as now, some have means and money and method and a lot, don’t, so the way to do things is to move forward in steps bite size alterations that make things easy, safer and more comprehensively new, and more importantly realistic, than the current way of life which is full of holes, and most if not all the world cannot cope with, and just cant get off the ground.
The tools of change depends on the concept of which those who talk it and those wanting it and where exactly does the voter, the tax payer and the those for reasons cant or don’t care or those that want change but if it features they pick up on the outcome or those that have other reasons, the thing that always I am reminded of, is the old slogans of the past, that well, there is 150 years of oil in the ground and well, the western economies have to be able to be competitive and well, those that want to go green are likely to cost jobs ra ra ra, but the arguments are futile and have no ground since the real evidence is clear, after Koyto, and after the COP 15 what in fact actually changed?

Was there any real change, did the plastic carry bag get banned did distribution lorries or semi-rigs really get taken off the road, did standardisation on plastics and a real attempt to recycle what was only gong to be burnt and buried happen it did not. The evidence is there, full and clear, in every street, in every new built house in the mall in the tat shop in the $1 shop there and everywhere that the world in the west lives on oil coal and gas, with no real consequence as the waste and the amount of use and have not even taken into account the issue of, what happens when the fledgling developing countries grow up and want a piece of the want and waste culture how long is China going to be there to make the junk that the west wants how many sweat shop jobs will go on for, the fact is clear, and the choices are clear, continue like this, or use the time that is left for oil, gas and coal to look and plan what to do next.
So we can see from the previous chapter that lifestyles, are those that:

A culture of which those in the “money trap,” are from birth expected to live under.
Have little ability to change and those that do, either cant, don’t want to or have invested interests that makes such greed and waste going since they are gain from it.
The bungling way that most in particular UK government wants to continue and really hasn’t got any plan to change.
Commodity markets.
Business.
Banks.
Psychology.
Psycho-mimetics.
Control.

The aspect of the money trap, is that like the use of natural resources what is it that the west is really all supposed to be about?   To  live you have to have money, and you have to spend it, and you are expected to have this and that, or a car or a use a product, but where does the use of natural resources come into the equation? When does the behind the scenes action on using natural means and methods and better use of the resources come into the mind of those that push the waste culture?  When has anyone ever been asked how to do things a different way?

When did anyone or any government make the time or the national effort to do something?

Briefly what would I do, just as a quick quiz? (fore example as a demo).

So, to change things it has to be done with the use of the data known such as how many houses how many types of care how many vans, semi-rigs, aircraft oil use, plastics use, wood use, in the form of iRES / SiSi and 7si.

Integrate the systems to deal with the changes that you want to make.

Evaluate the cause the reasons for, the means that changes could be made.

Planning what can be done, how this will affect the world and what is not really possible.

Field test the changes and allocate the correct amount of feedback to see what systematisation (SiSi) works and what is more simplified in the long term.

Collaborate.

Channel the changes that are a benefit.

Keep looking for the next way to do things.

Adaptability.

Inspiration.

Never be too proud to ask.

So some notions how I would do things, so if its G 20 or those in the European Union, or what ever the international government meetings are or where the questions remain since no one government wants to change and only wants to go on “as is,” the question is how long does “as-is,” really mean and how much planning has been made for stability after which the endgame starts to make ground  since the oil, the coal and gas will run out, that’s a fact that is an event that wither there is 150 years of oil, or wither you live in the coldest place on the planet or if you live in the dessert what is going to be done how can it be done and what effects would occur after ward,  and can the issue of nuclear nutters in North Korea, or irate Ayatollahs in Iran and Cheap and Cheerful in China, or those in rouge state really be allowed to get in the way, or should they just be sidelined if they are not interested?

So the problem that often has most if not all populations around the world scratching their heads is this is such a huge problem and such a massive event to tackle that some of it is unlikely to change and most of it is needed for one reason or another this is the usual statement, but when it arrives at the real issue of what did anyone really do to find out or what did anyone do to ask or where is the test results that could, make sensible changes now, rather than later, where is that little list?  Prof is the only fact that is given when someone vends it because they have to or are compelled to do so but with the ecology, there seems to be little in the way of proof that change will bring about damage and that change of lifestyles, use and waste will make life impossible.
So unlike the science world there is only 4 real rules that need apply.

1.Groundwork, test examine and allocation for looking into what is keeping the waste flowing and how that can be dealt with.
2.Process, how can any change really be implemented.
3.Cost and benefit what is the risks if the use of money is to be the main means of barter.
4.What happens when the endgame for fossil fuels arrives.

Any pilot list or list of items in the order that they have priority occurs depends on how the known data is collected how that is counted and processed and how that data is to be used to factor in what changes by determination, calculation, and forward planning can be done and how that related to the original aim.  If the true aim to deal with the addictions to fossil fuels and oil since that is the worlds most addictive drug, then how is this going to be a factor if so much depends on it and the worlds structure is completely based on it? This should be at the top of any list, that the waiting game for the endgame should be the goal, what how, why, and when. This is the goal the world should be thinking about to overcome the massive problems of cold climates, hot climates diseases, food and starvation which is what would happen if, the world doesn’t start to thing and look into the groundwork, of what to do next and if those actions are possible now, then as long as no one is left behind and the sequencing, steps keeps all those affected moving in the same speed then some if not a few could be implemented anyway.

   So if its G 20
Quo Vadis?   Oil has an endgame
          These are the questions
This is the groundwork

The truth is where ever people live in the world this issue of the fossil fuel endgame is not gong to go away.

The as is, factor, which is the world now and the issues that affect it, the issue is what to do about looking now what could be done and the reasons that some of those events could make a difference, in 2010 in the UK the chance to make a real change is only likely to arrive and then depart the scene and in 2010 there is the other set of avenues such as G 20 and the big fat European Summit, but what you wont see is that what this is all based on is a lack of admittance to a fault that the events that of cause and causality, the very  events that are perpetuated by the stupidity of the same mistakes the same joke theoretical tax incomes the same errors of using the lives of the public in some sado-dominatrix approach of pain and pleasure can work when its very clear as it has been since over the last 50 years that the bases of doing on the old same entrenched ideas only fails since the ideologies of gain, want, waste, acquisition, the “money-trap” and the worst of all, “live to work and the spend to live,” this is the stumbling blocks this is why it goes bad the “bad-ending,” of the economic endgame.

So time is here to make choices make decisions since what is done now greatly affects what happens tomorrow and the indelible mistakes of the past only leads to say, those that live in the past always starves the future.  So, the fun part, lets take stock and heart at what some of the most common errors are and how they can be augmented.
Who says things have to be the same?
EXPERIMENT IV

This project again is a break away from convention since why live in a world where the way something is done is the way things have to be done, this is one of things projects and aims that I haven’t while be captive in the regime of the UK been able to do, it is a two part series that asks only 4 questions not rocket science not blinding people with science but a real attempt to do one thing, what is it that a house or a home or a dwelling place has to be? In a convention, the idea is that a home, has to be built in a concerted way, since that is how it will be used, or that the needs of such an inanimate object, is what it is there for, we don’t, this again asks what beyond the OK standard of house building can be done, what beyond the “Status-Quo,” can be done, without actually burdening, the pockets of those that want a more energy efficient property, that is warmer in winter easy to keep clean easier to keep cool in summer and has the means to make itself pay, as well as it consumes this is real technology and believe me when I say this is state of the art and not some pipe-dream.  So remember the aspect or accent on understanding is not about blinding people with science its a means to allocate the order of priority, and set the ground test which allows easy understanding what, the issue is and what is the reasons for it and how to augment by either retro-fitting, or to act to develop what, can be, used or provided to deal or make the issues clear and how these can be mitigated.

So a home, (average descriptors are assigned), Groundwork, primer-set calculate the parameters A verses B or characteristics C:

1.0what does it do, and why do you need it.
1.1What about it works and what about the item is really of no value.
1.2How can this be understood.
1.3What can be done as to augment the issues.

4 simplified or simplcated, (simplified by syndications).

[purpose]:

The principle is shelter, the secondary is to provide safe accommodation and shelter from insects, rodents and radiological events RADS from nuclear solar process, heat, and so on, and from radiation burns, and features that permits the actions of food consumption, preparation and serving of food stuff, and recreational events, rest, to use the premises for guard from environmental, and climatic events, summer, and winter, to ensure a realm of security and the common practice of raise of off spring.

[build material]:

Common is cellulose wood and its derivatives, metal fixtures, electrical cables, glazed panes, of glass, autoclave baked bricks, concrete, cement, gyproc panels bonding agents, and other sundries, wood offers less protection from nuclear solar radiation, and from other radiological process such as Radon the decomposition of radioactive Uranium, where the half life or the amount of radioactive isotopes is decaying away in the form of a gas. The common implications of using brick over wood is that wood is easier to build but is thin, and is not in large segmented construction formats, and has to be treated. Similarly the use of brick does not imply that the brick is water proof as often the issue of rising damp, and a damp course, and the issue that additional render and that the interior of the building since it is made of clay or gyproc, (gypsum) and that such materials draw moisture and are like wood affected by a variability of climate such as summer seasons and high precipitation humidity, where the material is not sealed and therefore can become a health hazard, such as coliform moulds, often toxic, and other needs for which implies that the material is unstable.

[volumetric capacity]:

Dependant on the value that the accommodation is prescribed, “and-of” which, then prescribes the higher rate or use, and capacity overall needed, sleeping bays, car or other storage, garden access, sundries such as porch or other feature but not a genuine construction element, the area of use is the area that is freely used and the area required for other actions such as storage.

[cost to build]:

The cost to plan.
The cost to labor.
The cost to the land owner.
The cost in planning.
The cost to the environmental aspects.
The cost in regard to reliance on other modes.
Construction time.
Cost and time in regard to those who build and how the consume energy while they do.
Energy to ship, erect and emplace the build and the materials.
Is the initial cost but in most cases not the cost that is associated with the use or décor, or other formats for purely artististical elements that are not build elements such as paint, or wood treatments, wallpaper and so one, or what are considered fittings such as toilets, sinks, cupboards.

[use]:

An inanimate object that provides in one aspect but consumes with no actual means of conservation or energy production.  Class function.

[common used rooms]:

Derivable by use determination, sleep, cook sit, talk eat, play, study, business.

[part-time use rooms]:

Toilets, storage, out houses lean too, or similar add-ons.

[mass]:

The total mass is the volume of the build plus or minus the effects and the fittings that are added on later, the factor that the build is a production from which involves other process and application of energy the build normally once built doesn’t return that energy only consumes the returns  of energy from wood is only applicated (post use factor), after burning the autoclave baked brick doesn’t return any energy.

[energy acquisition]:

Commonly hydrocarbons, gas, heating oil, coal, petroleum, wood, normally the theoretical idea of self and group alignment of energy production is hardly ever implemented.  Commonly that the construction materials cannot cope with heat energy displacement into the atmosphere or the loss of energy that is implied to the body medium the air in a room is heated but is lost or loss occurs to poor insulation, or draughts or lack of window structure, or over night, or poor building lay out.

How is the energy used.
Why.
What is in fact required.
What is fact waste.
What is lost due to the overall use.
What is conserved.
If any is in fact produced by the building itself or if its only from acquisition.

[heads]:

Common, showers, bath, pools hot tubs, taps sinks, washing machines, dish washers washing, use of ancillary and sundries  use, waste for fun, car washing, and other uses.

[alternate heads]:

Common, not fitted or even implemented, lost to leaks lost to “blind use.”

[lifetime cost]:

Dependant on use, the use of the dwelling will incur that the building will use energy to propel the use that it accommodates, such as bathing, recreational use, sleep, heat or to cool the amount of use will in turn then depend on process from other uses of energy.

[exhaust and carbon rate]:

Typical fumes, waste plastic glass, ash, organic and synthetic commonly poly-plastic, card and board, wood, and paint, toxic and highly bio-toxic waste, common waste associated with “psycho-mimetic,” medical hygiene and person “lifestyles.”

Energy over 24 hrs.
Overall use of which is taken into account from summer to winter.
The volumetric value to be applied to the amount of each fuel source and how it is supplied.
The over cost of which the use of any fuel is used in one year.
The boost use since cold very cold or very hot climate and which is implied if the use of any natural resource is used in conjunction to the normal living requirements.
Totals overall use in taken the average punch outs.
The mean value taken into respect that common routine shows.
The higher exponents that overall the total use per billing indicated that the amount used.
The amount of fuel that is wasted from using a gas jet heater or boiler system.
The amount of blow-by gas.
The amount of wasted energy since the ambient is at a rate much higher than it was really need to be looked at.
The amount of energy use when the dwelling is in high use over low use.
The means and method to use which is waking and sleeping hours.

OK so where we have punched out the details on how a list can be applied in a set of theoretical applications this groundwork touches on the main features of what has to be evaluated with mathematical or standardisation, or statistical further reading or over all what in a neighbourhood would such a home actually do, so that the events can be taken from the highest possible use to the very lowest use to which must take into account the issue of vast variability to which such an event would the imply.

Second set:

[energy management system]:

Commonly none fitted usually the issue is that the use of a thermostat is used, to which the occupants use that to monitor the heat or the cold, or the amount of comfort heat that is often used in winter in an ambient heat rate of about 18-25 degrees centigrade. And in summer the outside air can be as high as 25 degrees centigrade similarly the occupants then want the air to be about 5-10 degree centigrade.  The amount of ambiance is the amount of comfort since the temperature of which the hight gas mass of the atmosphere, is then the larger body where the amount of heat loss and energy displacement from the heated or cooler air in a dwelling is the difference.

Common use.
Overall use.
Low use.
High use.
Other not accounted use.

[natural and organic, and synthetic waste as a resultant of dwelling]:

The amount of waste depends on how the building is used and how the occupants are expected to use the dwelling.

By nature of volume:

Exhaust products related to the use of energy. (any form implied).
Electrical,
Gas,
Water,
Organic.
Plastics.
Card and board.
Chemicals such as soap, washing up products and so on.
Coal,
Oil.
Wood
Glass.

[country location]:

Hotter climate such as California, or a colder one such as New York or Canada such as yellow knife, or Norway or sub Artic-circle countries such as Spain.

[inter-country effects of winter/summer]:

Hot summers and cold winters.

[pollutants]:

The by-products of bathing, eating, cooking, heating, use of fuels, barbecues, sports, car and building maintenance, and so on.

[additives of living as]:

Lawn care, wood care, building care, paints, preservatives, weed killer and so on, fencing, sport.

[green space]:

Open green space and the use of this for recreational use.

So in the simulation of applicated means we can see that a house what ever its size or reason or position is in fact an inanimate object that its chief action is that it is built its classification, and that the amount of energy that is the co-coefficients values that it occupies when the building is set.

After that is the use factor, in that the use, is the use of the construction, which means post building that the amount of waste that the use of the building then implies around the use of which amounts to accommodation.

1.Pre-energy use, and construction.
2.Use, and the energy that is implied.

It doesn’t matter if its a tyre, or a car door, or a ice cream maker a coffee machine, you television, set, or any other form how its produced and the energy signature it has, and the legacy echo that is then applicable to the purpose intent and the reason for the installation is the level of constructive energy evaluation, and overall impact that it would have, its therefore possible to accurately work out what a house would use over a year and the amount of pollutants it would then imply as a echo. So this is the groundwork so we know over time what something or some device or motion or action will do, its “energy signature.”  what is never given in the box and packaging, is a guide or any other type of clue that according to settings or use, or item what the product has or a rating for the level of recyclability that such a product, would do and how much of which of it is recycled per year or where or even how, this is the legacy side.

Legacy.
Energy signature.
Rating.
Amount of recycled content.

You also have to act post-works since the recycling and the cost of dealing with the junk, trash or any other attribute is a factor to add to the effect of the signature so this is a case that pre-planning, use, and redundancy, and the post-planning is then a correct way to test what should be really the direction of energy use, and efficiency, since if the use,  and the cumulative, use and the use of which, the legacy is not taken into account or the mis-use or “drop-out,” value of which the energy that is use is then consumed but no effective way to calculate it and calibrate the amount over time the rate of use, and the sum of which determination of which what is efficient and what is purely done for comfort or is wasteful from the start.
[[photo data]]

[[schematic required]]
The New Home

Augmenting the Prologues:
So again in this simulation, here we look at the dynamics of a common house, and we ask what could we do, in the world of today to simulate, what could be done, to standardise housing, on an industrial and mass application and is there any means that would not implicate higher costs and could really actually be possible to which could, be used to augment, and if a new way of building is safe, crime resilient and vandal proof, and has all the “green features,” all ready in situ, i.e. do it right first time, and the issue of what to do after or a for the issues of making energy efficiently after the completion of the build is seen as an argument only for those who see the old way as the only way, thinking about modern housing for the 22nd century, and what a home could become if, the way that:

The house is built.
What materials are used to construct it.
What benefits it would bring.

How this means and method could be used in larger housing schemes, and what could be done to:

Older housing systems.
Retro-fits of less energy efficiency where older houses, are more likely to use more power.
How a new way of thinking about house design could be incorporated into all housing builds, so that:

The building is stable.

It can produce heat and power from the start.

The building has one, universal fit, energy and heat control system and distribution that can monitor and take what ever action it needs to do, when the home is not in use as the occupants is at work, or that the occupant is at sleep.

The home or dwelling has a low carbon footprint and a low, legacy argument.

The key phrases that of course will be unpopular but would constitute an advanced form of housing are:

“legacy argument.”
“energy signature.”
“carbon footprint.”
“palletised batch build with the use of compartmentalisation of casement clad sections shipped to the build site already assembled.”
“to act as with others to produce housing that can produce energy from the start.”
“universal power distribution.”
“interactive self energy and heat management.”
“thinking about low maintenance, and fire control.”
“being able to be used in more challenging climates.”
“real consideration to how the building will be used and the features that it can offer.”

A house, is therefore more than it seems, it consumes it accommodates, and it has to be maintained, and it has to be considered as to what is it that can be changed? So a home is a model like any other, simulation to act is to understand what it does, what is must perform what its purpose is, to add the dialogues the to add or modify the actions “of which,” then provides a test and a field test to decide what is the best route to standardisation and then implicitness the template onward.  The argumentative factor will be the aesthetics since it is the factor that, people want, and the decorative factors that are associated with large housing, or with housing that is build for bespoke reasons, but this process means that either of these can be catered for, if, the relationship between what the building must do, and what methods are therefore applicable, how to make a safe escape would require a “kill switch,” to cut gas and electrical power and the option of a one touch fire control level, to activate a fire device such as a sprinkler system.

The legacy argument is clear what happens after the home is to demolished?
What happens in case of a tornado?
What happens in case of a flood?
What happens with extream cold?
What happens with extremes of weather?

Key set:

Foundations.
Walls.
Support structures.
Roof.
Interior.
Cladding.
Doors and double doors.
Heat and energy transference.
Hydrocarbons.
Hydrology.
Humidity.
Cost.

From the start the site, is also a factor old flood plains or a home at the bottom of a ravine, or on a high hill or mountain will all contribute to the nature of the home, common issues are the use of a set of foundations or the use of a slab-type, older houses are on stilts, and most wooden efforts are like that or have, some means to raise the house above the ground, the issue is to calculation of what has the best heat absorbency, and what retains the most heat, most people will go for the slab type above the sleeper wall approach and the issue of single line foundations since the amount of heat is kept tight were the older sleeper walls with a concrete dab or some other means to support the stretcher beams or joists.

Secondly is the walls, in the brick type the amount of energy used depends on the brick size that is used, the smaller the brick the more cement, or mortar that is used, the larger the brick the less, similarly the slightly larger wider brick can the have a better heat characteristics than the standard type normally as in the UK type.

Cladding is often used to beef up the issue, of water permeations, and the issue of cold air that blows against the wall and often the cavity wall system has to have additional insulation either cheap plastic polystyrene, or semi-foil insulations, or the use of injection insulation, this again is a factor due to the material of the build.

Interiors of the walls often use fire-crete, or some other means to line the walls usually this is plaster that has to be applied, liner boards, and often uses wood to bond the plaster boards to the wall or skin, and or often there is a bond used to match the separation of the boards.

Floors are usually divided by an interleave, usually electrical cable and plumbing is in this space heat is very easy to dissipate via this means, since there is usually just a flimsy plaster board, and a few joists above there is the normal floor boards, and a covering.

Above this is the typical roof scape and the worst waste of energy of all, the common plan is to use some thick insulation commonly 4 inch or 8 inch, but above this hardly ever is there a cover or a floor or some means to help maintain heat since above this is the usual header tank for water, central heating tank, and other water systems, for the use of gravity feeds, and the roof space is often empty just a weak roof set and common, a liner before the roof tiles common are pan tiles that offer no heat retention or similarly the pointless slate rock type tiles or cheap synthetic.

So augmenting the old.

The issue has always been that most if often housing is sold for profit, in the UK the fantasy claim of “more affordable housing,” depends on what is considered to be affordable and what if any is allowed to be built, since in most cases the fake, notion that high house prices are often associated with the absence of build, since those in the “Poverty Industry,” caught in this mess, cant and are hardly on the type of wages that they are expected to live on likely to have a “disposable asset income,” that can actually fund a house purchase similarly the amount of assets associated with a married couple will depend on the amount of wages they are paid, since one is related to the other and a lack and deliberate intent by crackpot laws, policy and “con-ology,” used by the regime to limit developing of new and more efficiency of a home and what and how many above the annual populations increase since one again is realisation of the other, here we can see that homes for rent, is not a factor in the warped minds of the UK democracy system.

What is really needed is a form of housing never seen or even considered this idea for “real technology now!”, and using 22 century styles is more efficient, since the new idea of housing is affordable since most of the cost is gone, in the idea that a “semi-form,” based on compact, sealed scalable, cladding units that are palletised and can be shipped to a site ready for the purpose of being lifted up, locked and welded into place means faster breed of housing, with an almost limitless application and and design that can be pre-set, to the requirements and painted, and set to form the shape of the house skin, based on a metal or a “skele,” or skeleton frame that has a fire resistant interior based on large autoclave blocks that are double tied to the frame and to the clad parts this application is beyond the old way of building since the metal sets can be no ferrous designs have little in the way of maintenance costs, easy to fix, wont rot, or derogate and cant be affected by “acid rain,” fire or other environmental and long term weather hazards and are “recyclable,” in that they can be moved if the building integrated skin is to be demolished.

This use of fully integrated, “industrial sectional house building,” would require a built in solar generation that along with its neighbourhood would then generate electrical energy, which is then shared over the range of the housing lines, would have the worlds first, sprinkler system per house “if in the event of,” i.e. a built in safety factor from the start that could provide the occupants, with time to escape since households are usually chocked up with combustibles, this “fire curtain,” can provide the essential break to make the escape from the building and the worlds only system where the electrical cables are not buried in the walls or under the floors they are for the first time in history of this planet in proper metal conduits that can sustain a fire resistance.

Since this type has group dynamics already established, in the form of power generation (or group energy dynamics GED), from the start and this is shared over say a terrace of 20 houses the sum is the amount of energy produced from each house per over 20, so if house one produces say 200 watts say over 20 x 200 = 4000 watts or if only 50 watts then x 20 = 1000 enough to run a set of television sets, or contribute to overall power use per terrace. Because this is networked over a large range say a 200 or a 400 house unit then the power utilisation is then much more conserved,  since that this power use per, is taken with an additional use.

Similarly the considered aspect of fire control is then taken into task, since the fire risk is much lower since yu have the accent of fire control en-suite since the lag from which the alarm is raised to the fire service or fire department and the amount of time that the combustion products then present a greater risk to he occupant and to the fire service personal, is then limited to the issue of less damage overall.

As in (SSi) or “supplemental safety aspects or devices,” the amount of safety even for a “kill switch,” is measured in points, so a factor above a break strain or fail zone, is then measured as 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and  so on by rule of thumb, the safety factor must be the rate of fail rate and the rate that can be supported by the surrounding structure above the rate that with a larger safety factor is the implemented / afforded, “of-which,” multiples of multiplication above the “fail-zone.”

And one automatic built in energy management systematisation for use of the redundancy of rooms not in use and those used in common or part-time use.

The common issue of which, how to and how do I do that, is demonstrated here, all the detail and how to make it.

[Characteristics]: Dwelling with, Group-Energy-Dynamics, (GED) Multi-Compartmentalised-Ablative-Cladding, MCAD) Segmented-Iso-Thermal-Heat control and Distribution, SiTHC) Poly-Static-Energy management, Poly-Voltaic-Windows, (PVW) Single-Line-Inner-Building-Integrity walls, (SiLiI) Skeleton Frame Work,   Interactive and Integrated “dash-board one stop controls,” Waste Energy Recuperation, Surplus Energy Transference, and Transpose System. (SeTaTS). Palletised construction system, with Ablative Tornado and storm plates, single slab base with service and heads drop outs and cut-outs for cable and pipe runs, adaptive, configuration and interlocking and self sealing casement units.

[Objects]:
[Conditions]:
[Limiters]:

[Delimiters]:
The Truth about The Welfare State
Preface

In not taking on the “blame-game,” to the point of becoming a bias argument, it is important to review what “welfare,” means in certain aspects noted, and what in fact the meaning of the “poverty industry,” need, and want, homelessness, and the issue of “night shelters,” and the other aspects that are incipient, in the aspect of being homeless, such as “hostels, dossers, churches making money out of the poor,” what the aspect of the “political pyramid” is how those on welfare are considered in culture or in the press, the hopelessness that is often the route cause, the process of “cant-work, wont-work,” and how the actions of “political fundamentalism,” ablative, and vile laws, rules and argumentative reason why those at the bottom of the common use of “money-trap,” got that way, and the issues, of why those in power wont admit that the whole scheme doesn’t work.

The detail of poverty is not having, where those that do have, it is also a route to crime, or being a victim of crime, ill health, and limited aims and aspirations, sociological, mental and other events that leaves the victims dissatisfied with life, disconnected, and resentful, walking around or being expected to live in shared housing or a great risk or those in the UK democracy claim that those that are on welfare, are getting something for nothing and getting a free lunch like the way most politicians do at the public expense.

Like most of the western world the UK has in most cases turned the poor and very poor into “commodities,” whom are used to fund those that can and do make money out of the disposition, with which they are the victims and then used by those out to make money out of the issue since this is advocated often by those in political parties very much so in the UK as the poor are seen as those that must do, but never know why, and must yield to the way things are and chase endlessly after a life that is never really be anything, and those in very severe poverty cannot realistic be expected to make a living out of wages that cannot ever support the kind of expenses and abilities that those on huge incomes take as granted, in such the aspirations of the very poor, grind along at a very slow space often to no avail or purpose but are seen as in the UK as the ‘working class,’ or in the more infamous years of the Thatcher era as ‘D’ class or drop-out or ‘down and out,’  this rotten secret is the one that even in 2010 the dependency and the need to hang on to the welfare state means a pressure bubble has then grown and as such this has then meant that those affected cannot un-couple form cash that is really keeping them alive and those that have no real intent or aspiration f work since they doubt that they would maintain a job, or that they would have difficulty in finding socially acceptable status in a group, or simply have given up any hope in a “money driven,” world of ever being or amounting to anything in a personal capacity, and the use of private organisations often the butt of jokes since those in politics use these to great effect to simple cook the books or find that making those unemployable wretches as out to pasture and can then use that as a means to sell the banner of change or full employment, or that such this is a package of measures that can then deal with those that could work but have issues beyond of which are not really admitted to, and the use of such greedy money makers out of  which the poor are then targeted are known as “private sector.”

Similarly those who make such daft and frankly moronic laws in the UK seem to feel that the attitude of the poor, shall be dealt with the notion that since the lifestyles of the rich and the dishonest members of the parliament are so greater than sliced bread that is how those in poverty should be, the issues is how much of that fantasy dream world of politicians is really physically possible.

The question is, what do you do when the dream sold to the masses doesn’t actually work? Poverty is a shameful thing and in a rich country like that of the UK the question is how is this possible unless that was the intent, the idea that, those in the upper echelons, of the pyramid, want suckers at the bottom to fill in with their lives in useless jobs, which are so low paid, and are only there for a time to which amounts loosely as a “flexible workforce,” the question is where does this flexible workforce appear from?

Its clear that the UK has it accent on being “crabbed,” since what exactly are those unemployable people really ever gong to amount to, on jobs that wont in fact cover the housing costs and cant possibly pay the rent or the private pension which is often talked about on TV on line and all that guff, about how people should save for a pension. One of those “crabbed,” approaches was that the old business model that the male was the bread winner and the little lady stayed at home an raised the children and that those in work did so for as long as they lived or the usual tax and Inland Revenue acted on that people would work for 25 to 44 qualifying years to then be entitled for a state pension, the significance of trying to get pensions on to the basic welfare is to make those over 60 back into work since the failed scenario of work until old age is a failure.

“admittance,” in this case is understanding that how do you make a life and a home if you in fact aren’t meant to?  Similarly, how do stabilise if you are in an unstable land?  The issue here in the UK the one word that is never spoken in the last 40 is those three essential words, “does not work.”

Jobs in this simulation, amounts to those positions that are only available as long as they are wanted, needed or adjust accordance to what the need or losses of a company or business is, the issue of change, in numbers the recyclability of such jobs or those that re-locate is a dependency on if they can, if they have the skill and knowledge and if, the aims actually achievable of if the financial risk is there.
Similarly there are only ever going to be a certain number of jobs, available for those applicants that can or are implied as needed or can apply for, or have the correct or the “menu style,” list of which the ogre of employers who have almost but dictated to government what they want and see as junk workers to which those that spend time chasing tend to end up with a non-sequitir, and have little hope of that job.

Employment as a job, or an occupation or a vocation or a filled vacancy is the act of being employed and the aim is to sell the body mind and whatever in the procurement of money, since in the money driven western world that is the aim of living in the minds of the politicians, since money then equates  the way that politicians use equalatrial mind thinking, or equidistant since the issue of those outside the ideologies, and those that are outside of the lines what happens then,  to then sell the dreams of life in the west, prosperity, gain, and so on.

So as there are only going to be a certain number of jobs, and the vacancies are taken on or dumped for what ever reason and the joke idea that people just turn up a employment bureau and then ‘get a job,’ or are told ‘to support themselves,’ or ‘contribute to the tax demands the question is how do they do that on a hit an miss, affair which has people rolling around and the aimless idea that they ring up, or write a CV or phone up an employer or phone a friend, the idea is lack-lustre from the start.

In this simulation a job is a means to meet the demand of the western world to have money, to live on, and the assessment, that a job or a engagement is a risk the risk of loss the risk of not meeting the demands of the risk, as implied by the work contract or events happen the amount of risk that can be taken on will depend on the financial and living companionship to the persons own life.

The application of this simulation where the G 20 is concerned is that this is the real details need to be talked over and this simulation is a real tool that can be considered where those especially in the UK fail to accept and fail to act accordantly, since they see that work is a demand and everyone must do, the issue is what if they cant, what if it is simply not possible or unlikely to delver any real prosperity or long term solutions for the demands of the “money-trap,”

The money trap is also a ruthless means of control since if you make people poor, and keep them that way then the money trap can be used as it is in the UK to foster the idea that any work must be taken but if any work doesn’t actually work with the idea of how do you pay for the expense then what use is that work the use of the “poverty industry,” is also used a lot, since those at the bottom stuck in the “money trap,” have to get money from somewhere and there invokes the next problem, welfare.

The endgame, is the only escape from the “money-trap,” is either be somewhere that doesn’t use cash, or move off the planet!!

The accent in 2010 by the UK version of the Republicans is the exact same events of 1979-1983 the read up and the video print out shows that in 1983 the Thatcher era did resent any aspect of the poor the laws and victims made out of this shows, up in 1995 as the Job seekers act and the means to stop the victims of the inventions of the “poverty industry,” under the housing act 1996, while under the Thatcher ear housing was cut by 70% and the the revolting then prime minister was clearly heard on two occasions,  that the poor should move into the private sector and that high unemployment is ok for in return for low taxes in the crackpot 2010 version of the Republican / CONserVATives this is mirrored in attacking the poor and telling them get a job or be cut off for 3 years so that the tax record would make it impossible to get any welfare and to try to con the voter that jobs and recovery and packages of which wont in fact change the issue of the greed from money and oil, balancing or as most of the western culture does expects that money, oil commodities markets and consumption and those working for the taxes and GDP will go on.

The Republican movement in the UK was  corrosive, and something that Konstance as in person, found that the idea of a Republican / CONserVATive act of government was dangerous ridiculous and only sold off the family silver and de-based the country, one of the rules that is taught from the start is never to debase yourself since if you do you have nothing to fall back to, as in the case of the Republican type movement that did damage and only bring more hardship and costs in mayhem and poverty than any other feature of the 18 blistering years of CONserVATives (the clue is in the name).

Debunking the old world, the idea that the “poverty industry,” can go on, and the refusal to accept that it cant and the “gamble and chance,” style of politics in the west is only going to server the few and not the many the fantasy of ‘full employment,’ was a sales pitch to sell the dream that everything will be hunky-dory but in truth not.

The details shown here are true, and this work and published paper can be used at the G20 if you decide that any points are needed, this is the detail that all across the world the issues that they will have to deal with sooner or later.

Project Ratcatcher January 1st 2001 – December 31st 2003

The Rt Hon Tony Blair, MP (member of parliament, and at the time Prime Minister), was implicated in this project and was fully aware that the “corruption-ring,” in the Department of Work and Pensions did exist and (at Plymouth and south west Jobcentres and social security, that often threatened to refuse to deal wit the public unless they fought out the existing client out of the way), and would refuse to pay unless the client had an address that the useless aims of central government in how people were to get jobs, and how this should be done, and the risk of “implosion,” should the event occur with the loss of benefit and how this would de-pressurise the dependency on benefit, the declassified letter now much of which was a remaining kept, artefact clearly shows in his own language that he did know and was fully aware of the legal warnings we had sent to him, the avocation of a lawyer and / solicitor, and that the people in the Devon Job centres did manufacture, fake dishonestly claim and manufacture false details and evidence this practice is still in situ in 2010.  Similarly the fake use of the national census and the fake attempt to use the national census and electoral roles was a means to try and get certain people within the poverty industry.

The old network of the DWP was:

Rt Hon Tony Blair MP (prime minister)
Secretary of state.
Parliamentary under secretary.
Caxton House (Level 6) as the chief executive.
Quarry House.
Regional director 4, Mrs Diana Ross.
District Office at Rydon Lane Exeter.
Jobcentre manager. (typically one before our actions got that changed).
Client or claimant.

This was the chain of command and the “reverse engineered,” route to find the links the concealed documents the secret files, dossiers, fake records and faked computer records, rights and rules hidden text in operation documents hidden and concealed local government documents, the 84 chapter 6000 page Decision Makers Guide, the statutory instruments, and so on, in the hidden pipeline back to the man who had lied, hidden the real issues about poverty and how he did it.  The Prime Minister of England in 2001 – 2003 not only knew about the issue but was complacent in it, even thou the data clearly showed that the Job centres were corrupt, and did use means and method to attack the public in any way they could do so.

So what is the “poverty industry?” 

Put simply its a means for those out to make money out of the victims of the money and greed society, in that the victim ends up paying in any way and every way for being poor, while the reluctance to house and the issue of a lack of concessions to aid the job gain is the case in the UK.

The means to make money out of those in a status of being poor, with which those in the state of being poor do not in fact actually benefit the accent is common in that the claim is that those in the UK get money for nothing in fact they hardly get any of it, the cost of the money only goes out the door i.e. is spent before they in fact have any of, it again another reason that the UK don’t want to admit, since the whole fantasy of blaming the poor for taking the bread out of peoples mouths would suddenly get found out for the pack of lies it was.
Under the schemes set up under the Republican era the idea is as in 2010 so, some 31 (from 1979 onwards to the present day), years that those in need cont get housed they have to move into the private sector, owned and commonly owned by private landlords who can own an unlimited amount of such dwellings, this arrangement can be owned by bankers, doctors, solicitors, farmers, in fact even the church bed and breakfast hotels, hostels, church crypts, charities, and so on.

It is common that those private landlords, in the game of milking the state have more than 5 houses.

Commonly what happens is the victim of he regime who has not got a home ends up on the streets gets beaten up or attacked or robbed or if they have a tent or sleep rough in a town centre or on a bench or in a field or in a door way, they get robbed sometimes by those also living outside or wintering out, for the Xmas break, if they enter the hovel known as a house in multiply occupation or HMO they have to pay a rent of sorts to do this if they cannot they must apply for a grant from the state, this can take up to 4 months to be paid. The actual amount of the rent depends on the amount of the rent the Local Housing Allowance was supposed to deal with the issue that local councils wanted the victim to pay up to 25% per week of the rent, so say out of £100. per week as a simple off the top figure, then the local council would say right you pay a top, up of say £20.0 per week then there is the tax from state, in the form of a property tax paid by the property owner, but those rented have to pay that tax, so the more victims in a house say one built for a family that is divided up into 4 rooms or 8 s or 10 s and a shared toilet with junk furnishing from a reclamation yard constitutes as furnished. So if you have 4 victims you have 4 lots or repeat tax that is meant to be paid for by the house owner, plus the water tax again supposed to be paid by the land owner so for water companies you have 4 times the income and the local councils now 4 lots of money as a grant paid to the victim then paid to them for 1 house that is not owned by the victims of the regime. So this could then soak up anything water wise up £10.0 per week so you now have only £70.0 per week since no concessionary pass is given as an incentive to find work the victim is then expected to pay full bus fare on the super monopolies to which can cost up to £5.0 per day.

The issue is then complicated by the issue of the expense of food, and consumption of consumables, or running a car, or smoking or drinking or any deductions from loans fro the state, and the deductions of which from failed marriage or debts run up or costs of finding work since the state doesn’t offer any concession to do that. After that, is the cost of clothing washing, electrical costs or running a mobile phone so you can see that the onus on this money is not in fact that money.

So the claim that people at the bottom of the pile are then sponging on the dole, are they?
    
         Are they really?

So the claim that people can take responsibility of themselves or be left to do that under a Republican type of  ‘social responsibility,’ as under the Bush ear of the TANiF and other failed ploys sold to the US as ‘compassionate Conservatism,’ the plot just fails and the whole idea that those in the UK who are so drubbed out by the society that clearly doesn’t want them and employment out of reach and the idea that employers have been such a big whip that they then treat people like a menu list or just dump the lot of and move the business to the EU area and then sell the over priced products back to the jokes they just dumped or get in the migrants Since in the UK its often 20 to a room illegal and cheap to employ.

The real life sadistic version of the UK type of republican attitude is to set up the victims to fall, since if they are then expected to take full responsibility for no matter what then the state can then leave the blame to them this is the essence of the job centre network, in 2010 the sadistic UK CONserVATives wanted to make the whole public under its ‘big society,’ a cheap con to make the public feel they had some power in fact it was a smoke screen to make them the fault of any issue of most of which would include the failed policies and laws inflicted upon them by the regime.
The warnings sent to both leaders of the old Socialist parties had the same meaning, If that you simply cut off the victims of being the unwanted rejects of the regime what would they do? And where would they go/ in 2010 none of this has transposed into anything the clear fact is that the UK does not want to change any of the actions of making people poor and keeping them poor, in fact the crackpot republican UK party, had another go at making the next generation of poverty industry, by claiming that those on welfare got too much, the question is what is too little if the amount of money paid doesn’t even cover the costs in the first place since the example of the costs, shows that the money from the welfare payments, in fact those who are supposed to get the money nearly always don’t.

The other game in the poverty industry is that use of private entrepreneurs, and charities, private companies that get sent the claimants to them since the claimants cant refuse, and other stupid gambits such as self-help groups that in fact cant do anything, the idea that throwing the rejects of the regime to the wolves that only will help cook the books  of statistical data but the victims of such will only end up more poor than they were to begin with.  Its also important to remember that those in such government agencies of supposed there to assist often have paperwork on the desk from which the last victim of people who have died, been injured or pushed out of the job, or that found that the job could not, in fact pay the costs of living.

In the project the test was to assessment of two factors:

1.What is the total effectiveness of the use of a job centre?
2.How did those in the agency then and now inflict torture regimes, on those that are seen as a joke and to be beaten up any time and every time the arrive?

For the first time in history this is what really happened, in two sets:

1.The means and method of what the victim is supposed to do.
2.Using training to reverse engineer, the “corruption ring.”

Most of the reasons that the victim end up homeless, or without any money is from the following list:

The job did not exist.
The job was already closed but the job centre refused to remove the applicant from the applied list.
The job and its employer had become insolvent.
The employers address had changed.
The contact details did not exist.
The contact was by telephone and without recording kit could not be proven.
No detail or guidance was given an how to record eh application by post and the use of record post only confirmed delivery to the site not the person.
Jobs are routinely added to a claimants file without telling them.
Job applications never got sent to the employer by the job centre.
Asking for and any enquiry even if there are no details as to what the job pays or has on offer automatically means the claimant has applied.
The job details were incorrect and the details once accepted means that the claimant has to accept the job or prove the reason why.
Claimants have to waste, money on phone calls, buy newspaper pay for stamps to write speculative letters, and have to pay for all transport and any other costs.
The issue of what money is now received and the forecast of what the job will pay doesn’t take into account that the work amount cannot cover the amount of living expenses.
The job is only part-time.
The job is for one day, or for one week meaning that the client would not be able to ask for any aid since they must wait for the pie date and three additional days plus don’t get any aid for two weeks.
The clients post office was changed.
An appointment was made to attend but the letter was intentionally never sent.
The time and routine was changed but never indicated, with intention.
The date of a review was changed but not indicated.

The claim data was not by intent, negligence or design, entered meaning that all thou the client was there to the pay system they weren’t.
Th location of the job, was impossible to get to by bus or the lack of a car.
The client did not have a bank account.
The job was beyond the psychical ability of the client.
The client did not turn up on time or was a minute or so late.
Pressure is put on the client since each job centre must earn points.
The client is packed off to a private money making scheme to get rid of them.
The client has to wait for 6 months for any intervention.
The client is not asked to come into to look for work and can do so on line but cant apply on line via a government, agency since this must be done on the phone.
Post with confidential data, name, full name and NiNo is sent to an unsecured address.
The interference by those not of the same name is done and not checked.
Those not the client including the staff ring up and close or interfere with the claim.
Someone not the client can apply for jobs in another persons name.
The claim address can be altered but not the person whose claim it is.

On effectiveness, this is a reflection of what actually happened and the NC, NOX and Red control, Green Control, and Yellow Control and Purple Control state. And the C, or cleared control or Cls closed on date test.

The employer does not have any right or need to reply.
The reply is sent to shared letterbox.
The reply is lost in the post.
The date for any interview, is lost in the post.
The address is incorrect and is not delivered.
The post man or woman delivers to the wrong address.
The letter appears after the interview.
The interview is for the wrong job.
The interview, is only making up the numbers.
The call back does not happen.
No data is ever included or recorded by the company of any contact between the client and the employer.
No response of any kind is ever taken on by the employer.
The employer has no record since they don’t have to maintain a list of who wrote or for what.
The job centre sends a list of any names that may or may not have applied and may include those that may not even know they are on such a list.

[NOX]: sisi code that indicated that the job was in fact already closed at the point of application.
[NC]: awaits for respond after 28 days the application is then termed Yellow Control status.
[NR]: Not Responded after the wait time up to 60 days after the application.
[Cls]: declared closed after the wait time.

[Red Control]: used to show outstanding on list, and to apply for. (date on list, time out, list to go in 1 to 7 days, record number and list time out to yellow Control). Rotational practice and Q-card for phone record. ECM/ACM used if job centre staff attack or try to invent or try to manufacture and event not happpend.

Form AGH used to if no compliment slip, or shop stamp or other means to such as carbon paper to prepare a comment that did attend interview.  Stock list of record of sending, for, which si free from post office often used as a means to record if the employer acts to denial.

Hearsay, and meaning ‘your chance,’ used by the UK government to fake the issue of a fair and impartial decision if the client is or fall foul of any of the above or has to attend a tribunal if the are a victim of in-work campaigns to get rid. Refusal to work or an argumentative event constitutes in the UK as gross misconduct even one word spoken does to.

Recommendations on how not to do things the UK way the first issue is to first take the issue of private rented accommodation out of the equation find people a place to live and find them work, saving over £50,000,000,000.00 in cash this is finding and getting people work not demanding and inventing laws that threat the client into the poverty industry.

Make the issue of being housed a condition that were applicable if no jobs or there is no work then benefit is automatically paid, not have to queue up to wait but a roll by roll series of interviews and then pay on the basis if their is work or there isn’t.

Deal with the issue of lack of skills and training the money that is saved out of private companies, and pointless letter writing and paying rent to a private rented property owner use that money to train people up.

 Beyond Oil
And when the oil runs out then what?

The issue of oil has become the issue that will affect those that live on it, and in almost all events that is most of the world the issue looked at are the identical issues we looked at in 1995 and onward, in that, what does happen if the oil is gone? Since the worlds most addictive drug, has now found a way into every home and to every work place, car, and into space. So what do we do when it all goes to the point that the reliance on a sludge that is only here once is done with?  Oil has an endgame it will happen and the claims that we have 150 or 250 or 300 years supply left is not an excuse since the rate of use will go up, since you have to factor in the world populations and their want to have the western lifestyles of want and waste.

In the blog of “did going green go mouldy,” was a test that the world and its economies are based on the use of open cast coal mines, deep coal mines, gas, oil and any other mineral or ore, the issue is that this is only going to last for a time, so will salt. In the UK is was noted that after all the talk the only talk was about making money out of the consumption of oil to make the world green but the instruments of going to the country to say that certain lifestyles would have to change and certain factors of what is the most wasteful practices would have to be changed, but since that and after December 2009 what did?

So what about all those crackpot ideas?

Our energy candidates, currently used:

Oil, used as for production of and with cat-cracking mordennite, conversion, fractioning and boiling used to make gas oil, cetanes and octanes, lube oil, waxes, and grease favoured for its shear ability to act like a set of ball bearings.

Coal class ‘C’ near or pure carbons often has to be pulverised into coal fed power station often only 45 – 55 % efficiency produces high quantities of steam if a cooling tower is implied, or a chimney if the flu gasses are untreated.

Nuclear, often used as a green alternate but only effectiveness is in heating up water to super rates and pressures to drive the similar turbines for electrical generation.

Gas powered power stations, often seen as a green alternate, but consumes huge quantities of natural gas per second.

Hydroelectric, often only in combination with dams or high water dams.
Water mills, and high flow river engines used a passive way to generation of electrical power not normally considered in the western world, evaluation required only effective if used in long parallel chains in a rows.

Hydrothermal vents, and similar, again hardly ever consideration of the western world.

Solar farms a new developing technology, but again hardly ever really used in the western world, requires vast expansion.

Wind power, the issue of position and the ridiculous arguments that it spoils peoples view of often miles of empty space so what is there to see? This is a true green power as in the case of solar farms should be expanded. Could be used on the coast line as or local out at sea since this is not effect to the land population and does not risk any noise.

Group House Dynamic using windows with poly-voltaic cells in the glass panes an built in solar panels on the roof from the start over a large housing schemes, needs a field test, field test needed, on effectiveness of compartmentalisation and casement batch building for this type of house system.

Plasma research, theoretical no longer taken on.

Theoretical particle synthesis using class a or class b, radioactive nucleotides as sub atomic particles and a electrolyte, to manipulate those particles to generation by the use of transposed electrons into a solution.

Bio-ethanol and bio-mass conversion first investigate in 1995, unclear how this will impact on farm land and how much of a effect it is.

Hydrogen fuel cells, the issue is how do distil the oxygen and hydrogen, from sea water or some other source such as the BASF process, or British Oxygen Comp.

Using water as a lubricant.

Standardisation of certain types of plastic.

Having a full list of recyclability, and how and where this should be done.

Using a new design for a bus, or a military vehicle  (as in part 4).

Haiti

The issue is how do you house people for a long time who have no money, or any means to buy the materials for such? How do you do that? Competitions, ideas, experts, ideas from big investors, maybe but there is another way, the idea of which I was given was that if you had a shelter light, easy to build but could be deployed fast, after a flood or a famine and could be used for years after instead of useless tents, and all the junk from the UK how would you do that? Easy when you know how.

The idea again is a little never really heard of tale of a way to make a sectional part flat packed shelter capable of housing up to 6 people that can be flown, trucked or shipped in bulk with little weight, and only needs a two person, and 4 tools and sections that are self sealing, that constructs outside in, so you first build the shelter skin, then add the eves, then you can build up the interiors, with the aim to have seats, table, beds, sink and electrical hook up points this is a way that again the world has never seen since this is the first time its ever been seen.

Who says things have to be the same?

The issue is how do you transport a home as a shelter within the confines, of simplcated and easy to build?

Easy when you know how!!

Two chassis elements stacked on top of each other.
Floor pans A and B already on.
Floor pan C to bolt on.
Truss over reach for connection of A plus B and C.
10 parts of a eves, windows, and sets of panels to make up the shelter.
Flat pack style interior packs.
4 tools.
Multilingual task sheet.
Interiors.
Bug nets.
Bunks.
Mattresses.
Lights.
Self sealing joints.
Bolts and screws.
Frames and panels.
Dividers.
Door.
Locks.
Sink.
Table.
Shelve kits.

And the best bit its fully movable recyclability to 100% easy to do, and easy to build.
Technology in the real world

    real technology now!

      Those who care – share!

Those that can – do

     systematisation know how made easy

?

Part 4

In

The

Light

of

Day

What price is life?

Military vehicle light armour.

Military vehicle APC.

Military APC gun truck.

Semi-Diamond wing.

Military vehicle very light armour.

Bus Design using the monocoque.

Robotics in war theatre to help preserve non-combatants.

“Fail-safe”

by Konstance Hill

[Coverage and aims]:

The range of this document only specifically, covers the identity of which any means and method of using the term described below in the context that it implies as such it does not occupy the total volume of which man similar versions and explanations of such uses are inferred, this document shows the correct, meaning in the format that the actual means of supplemental control devices of the type described would action or operate in the conditions here shown.

[Orientation]:

The orbit or orientation, for which this briefing paper is shown is to indicate that the given factors that amounts to the term used must occupy the status of which provides that to make something safe after the event or before, or that an event makes control impossible or fails that a means beyond or in addition or alternately could be used.

[Principles]:

The principle purpose of this briefing paper is to provide a document that explains the meaning, implementation and application of the means, method, use, limits, and practical implications of using this term. The common perception of a mechanism, or a means of supplemental or a means to control by an alternate or remote, or a secondary sub-system, referred to as a “Fail-Safe,” is a route which occupies that “if in the even of,” the primary control, stabilization, or guidance or similar means to monitor, operate or to maintain or keep control of a mechanism, a machine, or a device in any relevant meaning becomes compromised, fails, or has lost the capability to function in the desired constraints or the processes that the means or mechanism was principally designed, to operate or control fails, the an supplemental, device, interlock, intermeshed system, or interleave can be used to augment, control by remote or bring under the relevant status of control to the operator or prevent, stop, or inhibit control, operation or failure becoming to a point of catastrophic failure.

The methods can be fully automatic, semi-automatic, which implies that some interaction would be required to operate the mechanism, or that the safety system as a “Fail-Safe,” could be controlled or released, the operation can be by automatic detection in a safe state of operation, a pressure build up, a loss or change in any condition that specifically exists to maintain and safe, operation or details which amount to this to comply with a given set of rules, or parameters, or a set or statement of acceptable tolerances. The “action-state or status,” of a control means or method is the route or routine, that permits, or controls that a function, or a process operates in a specifically stated way, or performs in or to a given set of actions, limited or delimited factors, or has to comply with a given set of rules, or conditions or repeats or actions or activation or actuation to or by a set of instructions or operates to maintain control or keep the method or means or mechanism (however so implied) to prevent an accident or to keep a reaction or to act in an emergency. Should not be the case (“and if not”) then a set or sub-system or sub-set, is then used to restrain, modify or bring about a secondary set of means to perform the same action state.

This means of supplemental control, is often called a ‘back-up,’ or emergency control, in any way meaning the outcomes of the statement is the same, the reason for this is to add what is often termed “redundancy,” which, meaning that a separate or an interrelated or integrated, system, sub-set, or sub-system, is available should that the main process, operation control, system or any similarly implied becomes inoperable, or has failed due to a situation, lack of maintenance, or has failed due to specifically noted component, failure or link, or means to communicate control, or to expressly ensure that the primary is in control and if so, fails that a secondary system can then within a prescribed method, route or by a specifically tabled sequence can then effectively “stand-in,” as if the secondary control was in like to the principle master control system.

So the key phrases are:

• Master.
• Control.
• Secondary control.
• Back up or “Fail-Safe.”
• Supplemental.
• Augmentation.
• Action state or status.
• Restore control.
• Prevent or stop an reaction from going out of control.
• Safety mechanism.
• Make-safe.

The application can be any route or method that occupies the meaning that is must provide two functions that:

[objects]:

1.0 The original fault or failure is something that can be detected and has a means to detect. The fault must then register in some way and such an error or fault can then be ascertained to determine the danger or the catastrophic failure and which the level of which this event can or would then pose a risk or risk of collapse or injury, or damage.

2.0 The event which has caused the initial error or complication or has breached the given set of operation characteristics has then removed from control, a safe or a normal given set of operational parameters, to which this then occupies vacant control which would then imply that the device or mechanism or primary operation is now not under any principle control. Or desired control route or routine.

3.0 The supplemental means or method of control can detect the error or loss of control, or can be actioned or activation becomes the given state to “stabilization” or to render the arrant or defective means of control, back to the original action state, or bring about a means to keep or maintenance of a safe process, or operational functionality, or to stop the means or process or operation, of the method or means or mechanism.

[Characteristics]:

4.0 the actions of such a supplemental method of control, is to match, or be as a supervisory, or a governing method of which must have a specifically detailed, sequence that occupies that the device or means operates when it is so required to do so, “but, if not,” a third, or any number of methods can be used in addition to this secondary safety application, the object being that, this secondary “system is a built in safety factor,” this means that, should events, being natural, unseen or unknown, or that such a fault or failure would cause a risk, or a factor beyond which could be acceptable or would risk life, or bring about a catastrophic secondary set of events (a chain reaction), that this secondary system or any third or any other supplemental, system could then aim act, or bring about the means to restore control, by a specifically set route or means of operation.

[Reasons]:

5.0 A means to control or operational supervisory, actions to which the “primary,” operation, must comply with a given set of instructions, or must occupy, by a route of sequence, or by constraints or conditions, to a given set which the device, or process, or any other implications must relate to, or perform to that given set, or parameters, or perform to a given set or rules, or actions when the means or mechanism is so instructed to do, or and act by the set of operational limits set.

6.0 The “secondary,” or that which occupies a supplemental, means occurs when the initial means of control is affected by a natural, unpredictable, unknown, or previously unknown or that which could not be predicted, by estimation, simulation or trail tests, or field tests, or a “wild,” event or by a set of or chain of events that means that the initial control state or stage or stabilization, becomes to a state of vacancy, this means that the overall action or required action that must be, or has been instructed to the primary did not action, or activate, and as such then a second or third or any number of redundancy, can then be used, in any order which complies to act with the intent of control without the actions of being contrary, or act to block any one, or any other means to archive the given goal, the use of “wild,” means in the statement of “wild-card,” or some reason that primary control was lost, to which could not be understood or could not in any event be noted was a risk or a complication that was considered or expected.

In this section, the key phrases were:

• Unpredictable.
• Vacancy.
• Redundancy.
• Safety factor.
• Wild.

[Application]:

An operational aspect, of any process, means method, or actions or activation, of any way so meant, means that a device, or a mechanism or process must be with in the state that is required by operational demands. Control means to operate monitor, or action something indirectly or directly by a valve, a switch, or a by a lever, or by a console, or any similar or like means to act in the sequence to perform an operation or to make or cause such, when something is under control, it is therefore performing in the sense of usage. Safety depends on what is determined to be or to amount to that order, or by what is seen or taken or to effect such a statement, of which the process or action retains the statement being safe. The means to be supplemental, to act to archive or being that brings under control an arrant, process or remote device, is any means that is similar or like controlled automatically, directly or is autonomous, (can action on its own or by its own power) or such a means that occupies an action state, or is used “in the event of.”

[Limits, scope and range]:

Process, or a process means in this statement that a given set of limits are prescribed, to which that what ever the subject matter, material, functionality, reaction, mechanism, route, tool, chemical, reaction, machine, actuation, or any similar is given a set of rules, or instructed or a given set of defined set of routines, or working stroke, or channels that the device, or any similar must act by, through or is limited to, or must act within a given set of limits that allows function but limits the excessive or un-desirable action or that which the item, device, or material, would no longer be able to act, or function, if the item under question became vacant, that is exceeded the limits that the material, or the original specifications that the device or application is rated to, or by, or can safely act on, or to the given set or statements such as pressure, time, ingress, force or any similar in nature or contextual or factor that was originally set. A functionality is a means to control something, by the route or means of process, or by a mechanism or by transposing the intention or desired outcome by a route or a vector that performs that function directly, or indirectly, or by a set of means of control that occupies what must occur, or by what way such outcome can function by.

[Outcomes]:

The goal will depend on the function that the supplemental device is prescribed to perform given the means or the method or the routines that are intended or implied, as such the outcome will mean to stop, a function, to stabilization, or bring about control, or to augmentation of such control or to prevent.

the use of the word safe, should not occupy the use of the word unless it can be correctly shown that an statement confirms to the set of given rules and occupies a correct orientation that prescribed what is safe, and what amounts to being actually safe, the mis use of such a word occurs when the actual tests, and factors that were not counted or in fact the whole method of testing was defective did nto offer any safety and was not safe from the start.

The use of a (“fail-safe,”) cannot qualify if the actual means to make safe cant of if it is not in tow or in line with the original fault, or if the use becomes occluded since the factors that caused the original error was not actually or practically tested in the first place this occurs when the action of testing or evaluation for safety has become occluded in such as way by factors which are known, or unknown, or by intent, lax standards, weak planning, or by design, wilfulness, or by neglect, or negligence or by some route, person or modification by such persons or a culture of lax or incorrect or lack of understanding what or how such should be tested or acted upon, or that did occupy the fact that the event was either reasonable foreseeable or could that the limits or proper planning could have been taken unless it is a genuine accident in that such an event even if certain aspects were taken into account still could not prevent an event since the original test for what is risk and what then presents, as which could be dealt with either was weak in nature or by which did not offer any guard anyway, if something that is foreseeable, or that is in fact reasonable depends on the statements that something was previously known but this does not remove the fact that it was not noted or that some aspect was known but due not re-evaluated the statements of what is safe was not acted upon.

Reasonable means what is capable but it does not actual mean a call of judgement nor an indication or the use of subjectively to see or application or appointment or approach of the actions which what is reasonable on one evaluation then becomes occluded if in fact more testing or evaluation was not carried out, or monitoring and if such the is too much safety that the safety means in itself makes the situation unsafe. Resolution of a event is to act to augmentation or stabilization but may not in fact be a means to continue if the error is not corrected.

Any safety device is only as good as the maintenance, and the actions to evaluation ot the effectively ability for such a device to deal with an emergency. Any action which is potentially dangerous and is not covered or has a (“fail-safe”), implied but then an error or a catastrophic failure occurs is not detected or determined or has no means to operate or has no means to be used is then not a safety device and if not independent or has no means to deal with the original factor cant be considered a safety device. Any safety device that is intentionally modified or has been tampered with is not a safety device, any device that has no means of operation outside of the original device is not a safety device, any means to augmentation which was not correctly calibrated in the first place is not a safety device.

The actual use of a device, is clearly shown that is below the use of a “kill-switch,” which is the final device in a chain that would be used to control or simply deal with a risk or a danger that the previous sub-set did not or was unable to do so, this is a form of “crash-prevention,” the science of stopping errors before they happen not after the event.

Using an “fail-safe,” also implies that the method and the system must be able to work most often depending on the configuration and conceptional design that such as which a device should be able to work, either as a extra safe guard by routine, or beyond what is normally considered to be safe, or can act with an autonomous format or can be used to with which is beyond the original device.

Brits changing views on EU

[S3.17.6.2010]

[world edition]

[stack counts 3322]

In most of the televised speeches from the right wing government the voter in the UK had to endure a large amount of “chatter,” over the reluctance to devolve any further powers to the EU or European Union the former, EEC, however it seems the publicated referendum, that was a statute factor belched out over and over again seems to have gone down the toilet bowl as fast as this “sales-plug,” was rammed into the minds of the voter. The strange episode of wanting to pull out of the connections from the EU and the need to haggle and monitor the edicts from the EU has become contorted and the language of being a driving force seems to have become meek and mild were the former spicy language of seeing the EU has taking over, the so-called ‘euroskeptical,’ voice not of the voter in the UK since the long debarcle of rows over the particular organisation have in fact not been allowed to be discussed by the voter or allow them to speak up, its the case in the UK that the voter is told what to think, and told that actions are needed but then not in fact allowed to have any application ot emplace input, just end up as normal with the UK brand of democracy as being the customer of what conceptional ideological reasoning that the governments of the country have decided will be the end outcome of any discussions, strange again that after all the ‘guff,’ in the run up to the 2010 elections, we see again that the voter is being told, not asked what they want, since the 40 years of mental brain washing on what to think and the mental conditioning of what is good and what is bad in the world of course the voter should they then get a vote and a voice would vote for either to leave the EU or have a lower interest in the organisation.

So 1 month after which, the clumsy attempt to sell to the voter that a change of government would the equate to a change of direction we can see again that this is turning into a tour of the world paid for by the tax payer, and the end result of the democratic process, is that we see that the current ideological and the use of “political fundamentalism,” is in fact the language of our UK and not the voice of the voter since what means or qualification therefore permits those opposed to any change with which is then acted out via ideological routes then denotes that this is what the voter wants since they have in fact not been asked at any point what, they should allow EU edicts to do, or otherwise.